George A. Sprecace M.D.,
J.D., F.A.C.P. and Allergy Associates of New
London,
P.C.
www.asthma-drsprecace.com
The Involved Citizen - Common Sense Revisited
> Abortion, Morality, and Ethics <
Please visit the following website and other
Asthma-DrSprecace.Com pages for excellent
and
up-to-the-minute daily news and commentary regarding this vital issue
and
all the legal and political activity going on. And please ACT on
the
information
that you gain here. Thank you. GS
www.lifenews.com
> The Catholic Church
<
Physician-Patient
Spirituality
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"RES IPSA LOQUITUR"
GS
Fellow Patriot,
I
feel like our culture has forgotten—or ignored—some very important and
basic lessons when it comes to the development of human life.
Our
society has been infected by an anti-life ideology, treating its most
vulnerable members as disposable objects. Abortion that was once
thought of as a last resort in a medical emergency has become the new
normal.
Medicine
tells us that life begins at the moment of conception. It also tells us
when an unborn baby develops a heartbeat, brainwaves, and nervous
system. Yet, despite all of this, the unborn are not treated as though
they are alive or even human.
As a surgeon, I have operated on infants pre-birth. I can assure you that they are very much alive.
Life
is a precious gift that has been given to us from our creator. No
person is disposable, and every life is precious according to Him.
I
believe that everyone deserves life, even those who have been denied
this right by our society. I believe that together we can make a
difference and bring dignity and a voice to the unborn. I also believe
that I'm not alone in this belief.
I believe that you believe that too.
I've
started working with a group of like-minded individuals who are looking
to change our culture. We want to build a society that values life but
that takes people like you and I making a commitment.
The
first step is clearly stating what we believe and what we are willing
to do to protect the lives of the unborn. Will you join me today and
stand up for those who cannot do it for themselves?
I've
created a new pro-life pledge; I'd love your support. Would you read
the pledge below to see if you align with our shared goals and are
willing to commit to fighting for the lives of the unborn?
https://offers.americancornerstone.org/pro-life-statement/
Regards,
Dr. Ben Carson
Founder & Chairman
American Cornerstone Institute
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT
"ABORTION"? LET'S TALK ABOUT ABORTION.
"ABORTION". "A
PREMATURE BIRTH THAT OCCURS BEFORE THE FETUS CAN SURVIVE".
When done intentionally by the
mother, it is either a "killing" or "murder" of a human
being.
Human life occurs at the moment of
conception. Long gone are the days when "18 weeks' or 'Quickening"
were the accepted criteria for "human life" - out of ignorance.
Abortions have been with us since
the earliest days of the Holy Bible and its subjects.
See: "The Catholic Church
and Abortion", by Fr. William Saunders, (in Arlington Herald")
for an excellent summary of the subject during the last several thousand
years.
The frequency of Abortions has
always been a marker for the level of Immorality in a population. It is at its
highest level now and since the breakdown of social order beginning in the
1960's. It has also tracked the drive for freedom and equality for women, the
developing weakness of men, and the confusion introduced by "gender".
"Roe v. Wade" never
declared Abortion legitimately to be Constitutional. It was from its passage
and since then until recently a travesty of Law, Morality and Medicine.
It's place under the Law should
reside in this Republic at the State level, despite its illigitimacy in
Morality and in Medicine, as long as large segments of the population continue
to support this irresponsibility. In no way is Abortion a right to "Health"
or to "self-control of a woman's own body". A woman's pregnant body
is no longer just "her own".
Nevertheless, even a large number of
Catholic women support that tripe and the Presidential candidate who drives
that position. What scandal!
See: "What's Driving
Catholic Support For Harris?", by Peter Laffin (in National Catholic
Register September 22 - October 5, 2024, pA1).
Both women and men should accept
their equal responsibility for this issue - and for other ways of dealing with
it.
Meanwhile, neither women nor men
should make this issue a controlling factor in how they vote this November - in
the most consequential election of the last 50 years.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
AND WHY IS THE ENTIRE ROMAN CATHOLIC
HIERARCHY NOT SAYING THE SAME THING?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
USING "WOMEN'S HEALTH" AND
"REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH" TO TRY TO "JUSTIFY" ABORTION IS NOT
JUST HYPOCRACY. IT IS EVIL.
GS
This isn't over ... yet
Fellow Patriot,
I feel like our culture has forgotten—or ignored—some very important
and basic lessons when it comes to the development of human life.
Our society has been infected by an anti-life ideology, treating its
most vulnerable members as disposable objects. Abortion that was once
thought of as a last resort in a medical emergency has become the new
normal.
Medicine tells us that life begins at the moment of conception. It also
tells us when an unborn baby develops a heartbeat, brainwaves, and
nervous system. Yet, despite all of this, the unborn are not treated as
though they are alive or even human.
As a surgeon, I have operated on infants pre-birth. I can assure you that they are very much alive.
Life is a precious gift that has been given to us from our creator. No
person is disposable, and every life is precious according to Him.
I believe that everyone deserves life, even those who have been denied
this right by our society. I believe that together we can make a
difference and bring dignity and a voice to the unborn. I also believe
that I'm not alone in this belief.
I believe that you believe that too.
I've started working with a group of like-minded individuals who are
looking to change our culture. We want to build a society that values
life but that takes people like you and I making a commitment.
The first step is clearly stating what we believe and what we are
willing to do to protect the lives of the unborn. Will you join me
today and stand up for those who cannot do it for themselves?
I've created a new pro-life pledge; I'd love your support. Would you
read the pledge below to see if you align with our shared goals and are
willing to commit to fighting for the lives of the unborn?
https://offers.americancornerstone.org/pro-life-statement/
Regards,
Dr. Ben Carson
Founder & Chairman
American Cornerstone Institute
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"VENGEANCE IS MINE. I SHALL
REPAY" SAYETH THE LORD. (Romans ll).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
THIS IS THE MOST PRINCIPLED, LAWFUL AND COURAGEOUS STATEMENT MADE BY PRESIDENT TRUMP AND BY A POLITICAL PARTY.
Now all that is missing is the EXCOMMUNICATION OF JOE BIDEN.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
April 8, 2024 Trump Statement on IVF and Abortion
Under my leadership, the Republican Party will always support the creation of strong, thriving and
healthy American families. We want to make it easier for mothers and families to have babies, not harder.
That includes supporting the availability of fertility treatments like IVF in every state in America. Like
the overwhelming majority of Americans, including the vast majority of Republicans, conservatives,
Christians and pro-life Americans, I strongly support the availability of IVF for couples who are trying to
have a precious baby. What could be more beautiful or better than that.
Today I’m pleased that the Alabama Legislature has acted very quickly and passed legislation that
preserves the availability of IVF in Alabama. They really did a great and fast job. The Republican Party
should always be on the side of the miracle of life and the side of mothers, fathers, their beautiful babies,
and that’s what we are. IVF is an important part of that, and our great Republican Party will always be
with you in your quest for the ultimate joy in life.
Many people have asked me what my position is on abortion and abortion rights, especially since I was
proudly the person responsible for the ending of something that all legal scholars, both sides, wanted and,
in fact, demanded be ended: Roe v. Wade. They wanted it ended. It must be remembered that the
Democrats are the radical ones on this position because they support abortion up to and even beyond the
ninth month. The concept of having an abortion in the later months, and even execution after birth — and
that’s exactly what it is. The baby is born, the baby is executed after birth — is unacceptable, and almost
everyone agrees with that.
My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint. The states will
determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both, and whatever they decide must be the law of the land. In
this case, the law of the state. Many states will be different. Many will have a different number of weeks
or some will have more conservative than others, and that’s what they will be. At the end of the day this
is all about the will of the people. You must follow your heart, or in many cases your religion or your
faith. Do what’s right for your family and do what’s right for yourself, do what’s for your children, do
what’s right for our country, and vote. So important to vote. At the end of the day it’s all about will of the
people. That’s where we are right now, and that’s what we want. The will of the people.
I want to thank the six justices — Chief Justice John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett
Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — incredible people, for having the courage to allow
this long-term, hard-fought battle to finally end. This 50 year battle over Roe v. Wade took it out of the
federal hands and brought it into the hearts, minds and vote of the people in each state. It was really
something. Now it’s up to the states to do the right thing.
Like Ronald Reagan, I am strongly in favor of exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. You
must follow your heart on this issue, but remember, you must also win elections to restore our culture and
in fact to have our country, which is currently and very sadly a nation in decline. Our nation needs help. It
needs unity, it needs all of us to work closely together. Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative,
everyone. We have to work together. We have to bring our nation back from the brink, and that’s where it
is. It’s at the brink. And we will. We will do it. I promise you, we will do it.
Always go by your heart, but we must win. We have to win. We are a failing nation, but we can be a
failing nation no longer. We will make our nation great. We will make our nation greater than ever before.
Thank you very much.
My Response to Trump April 8 Statement on IVF and Abortion
On April 8, 2024, former President Donald J. Trump made an important
statement on In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and abortion. Although the
media did not really pick up on it, the initial part of the statement
(see the full text attached), was devoted exclusively to Trump’s
support for IVF. While Trump’s purported goal to support strong
healthy families and "to make it easier for mothers and families to
have babies" is laudable, it is an axiom of ethics that the end never
justifies the means. IVF can never be morally justified or permitted,
insofar as it involves the destruction of innocent human beings
(embryos) and because it denies the natural right of a child to be
conceived in the marital embrace of its mother and father.
Trump did not cite
any specific polling data, but if his assertion that the overwhelming
majority of Americans supports IVF is true, I would say that the
support is largely based on emotion rather than the result of a
thorough examination of the complex ethical issues surrounding IVF.
Simply put, IVF is not a morally acceptable means of promoting babies
and families. (That being said, it is important to note that all
children are made in the image and likeness of God, regardless of the
circumstances of their conception.)
In his statement,
Trump then launched into a “clarification” of his position on
abortion. He took credit for the overturning of Roe vs. Wade, which he
said now shifts the issue of abortion entirely to the states and “the
will of the people.” He also expresssed his strong support for the
exceptions of “rape, incest and life of the mother.”
I believe Trump
accurately described the legal status of abortion today, which is
eerily similar to that of slavery immediately prior to the Civil War.
His shift in messaging was clearly an effort to distance himself from
the perceived political liability of taking an anti-abortion stance.
However, the current status quo of relegating an immutable human right
to the “will of the people” is unsustainable. It risks tearing the
country apart and can only be resolved by recognizing, judicially
and/or legislatively, the inherent right to life of every human being
as the supreme law of the land. (We are witnessing exciting
developments that give us great hope that the recognition of
constitutional personhood will come sooner rather than later.)
Trump’s statement on
the “exceptions” could be an acknowledgment of political reality while
opposing all abortions. Or it could be a position that children simply
do not have the right to life in cases of rape, incest or life of the
mother. Given Trump’s other comments on the topic, it sounds to me
more like the latter. What it means is that Trump supports the
intrinsic evil of abortion in at least some situations.
Despite his
purported deference to states’ rights, Trump criticized the abortion
law that was upheld by the Arizona Supreme Court this past Tuesday as
going too far. That law is similar to laws in a dozen or so other
states. Trump has shown us very clearly that his policy positions on
the right to life issue are driven by politics rather than principle.
This is deeply disappointing given his words at the 47th Annual March
for Life in 2020, "All of us here today understand an eternal truth:
Every child is a precious and sacred gift from God.”
A candidate who
compromises on fundamental moral values renders himself unfit for
public office. In the words of Pro-Life Leader Frank Pavone, “Every
elected official on any level of government, who takes a position in
which they fail to recognize and work for the protection of the right
to life dishonors the very meaning of their office. Because you can’t
be a public servant, if you fail to tell the difference between serving
the public and killing the public.”
Yours for life,
Gerald (Gerry) Yeung
Let's start with what
I believe.
- I
believe that human life - and personhood - begin at conception, the union
of sperm and ovum.
- I
believe that there should be a Federal Law of Personhood enacted declaring
the above...and thus protecting the conceptus/human being under the U.S.
Constitution.
- I
believe that Abortion is the taking of a human life and should be always
illegal Except to protect the Life of the mother. Here I do not support
the exclusions of Rape or Incest. Those are not the fault or negligence of
either baby or mother. There are other solutions in those cases.
- Here
I believe that that the current reality of IVF runs counter to the above,
benefited partially by the "saving" of the other fertilized ova
or by donation to another recipient.
What i know is that
the strong majority of voters in this country do Not believe in the above...and
that they would vote down the candidacy of anyone who so declared,,,thus
eliminating any chance for anyone to enter Government to try to change the
status quo. I myself believe that I lost the State Senate race in 1990
largely for being clear on Abortion,
Mr. Yeung is clear in
his frustration with the above state of affairs. But he should give credence to
the above state of affairs in this Democracy.
President Trump has no
such problem. See his next-to-final paragraph of his own statement.
If Mr. Yeung seeks
more clarity and consistency, he should question the Cardinals of his and our
Church. When is Joe Biden going to be Excommunicated?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"IS ANYBODY THERE? DOES ANYBODY
CARE?"
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Did he really just mock the Sign of the Cross?!?
Joe Biden is either stupid, senile, or has decided to go “all in” on his new abortion religion.
Or maybe all of the above!
Biden made the Sign of the Cross as a fellow Democrat was attacking Florida’s pro-life laws — at an abortion rally!
We aren’t stupid. We know when we are being mocked.
Biden disgraced every Christian believer in America… including his own purported Catholic faith.
Joe Biden is now fully committed to the new left-wing dogma of abortion on demand, for any reason.
Joe Biden’s abuse of our faith cannot go unanswered. That’s why we are
prepping a massive ad campaign to make sure every Catholic in America
understands what just happened.
Especially those Catholics that live in states that will decide the
outcome of the election this November, including: Florida, North
Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, and
Pennsylvania.
The Sign of the Cross for abortion?
Every Catholic deserves to know the truth.
P.S. These attacks on our Faith are not slowing down. The pressure is
only going to build as we race toward Election Day. Which is why the
best way to help us fight back is to become a CatholicVote Champion.
It’s super simple!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
IT'S ALL HEARTBREAKING. REGARDING THE LOST CHILDREN AND REGARDING THE LOST
ADULTS.
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report
Top Stories
• Poll Shows 66%
of Americans Oppose Abortions After 12 Weeks
• Planned
Parenthood Made $2 Billion Killing Babies in Abortions, It Doesn’t Need Our Tax
Money
• Biden Admin
Report Tries to Exonerate FBI for Targeting Pro-Life Catholics
• Kansas Gov
Laura Kelly Vetoes Bill to Support Adoptive Families, But Promotes Abortions Up
to Birth
More
Pro-Life News
• Trump Leads Biden in Latest Presidential Polls
as America Struggles
• British MP Pushes Measure to Legalize
Abortions Up to Birth in UK
• Couple Chooses Life
for Disabled Baby Despite Pressure to Have Abortion
• Leftist Democrats Release Radical
Pro-Abortion Agenda for a 2nd Biden Term
• Scroll Down for
Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"TRUE, TRUE, AND
RELATED".
GS
Trump on abortion
President Trump released a video statement on abortion today.
His statement was both praised and criticized by pro-life groups.
In his message, he did not back any federal abortion ban, and instead
said abortion laws should be set by the states. Trump also affirmed his
support for the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, while
calling out Joe Biden and his extremism.
I have been in regular contact with senior advisors to the Trump
campaign. We’ve made clear what Catholics believe in principle while
acknowledging the need for prudence given the electoral landscape. We
can never compromise our principles. But we can, as St. John Paul II
explained, work to limit the harm of unjust laws, or lessen their
negative consequences, even if we cannot achieve the entirety of our
long-term goals.
The question remains: How do we win elections and save as many children as possible?
Ultimately, while regulations or bans on abortion may be necessary, we
have pushed our political leaders and the pro-life movement to focus on
what we support rather than just what we oppose. That means standing
true on principle, but also avoiding the media’s lies about abortion
“bans.”
The abortion industry has ravaged the landscape for 50 years. The
sexual revolution has done enormous damage. Women are in the middle,
exploited by Biden and Democrats, and told abortion is the only answer.
That’s a lie.
We need to proudly champion a Culture of Life.
While the reality of federal legislation to regulate or limit abortion
remains a challenge, the answer is not to surrender at the federal
level. Instead, our government must act to promote the gift of life,
and celebrate and do everything possible to help pregnant mothers who
choose to keep their children.
If Joe Biden and the Democrats can spend billions of dollars on the
abortion industry, it’s time to level the playing field and provide
comparable resources to the pro-life movement. Things like support for
pregnancy resource centers, maternity counseling, subsidies for
alternatives to abortion, including adoption, and so much more. Every
corner of government should be resourced to help promote and support
women keeping their children.
And it’s not just about the terrible injustice of abortion. America
needs more children. A nation that isn’t having children is a nation in
decline. And we are below replacement already. Indeed, but for
immigration, we would be sliding down the demographic death spiral now
underway in Europe and Asia, where the population of once-thriving
nations is in serious decline.
Here is the statement I released to the media in response to Trump’s statement:
The federal government cannot abandon women and children exploited by
abortion. Leaving abortion policy to the states is not sufficient.
While federal legislation on abortion policy is challenging at present,
we are confident that a Trump administration will be staffed with
pro-life personnel committed to pro-life policies, including conscience
rights, limits on taxpayer funding of abortion, and protections for
pro-life states.
Furthermore, no woman should face an unexpected pregnancy alone. We
believe a new whole-of-government approach encouraging and supporting
pregnant women to keep their children can be advanced under a new Trump
administration.
President Trump’s latest statement on abortion reflects the electoral
minefield created by Democrat abortion fanaticism. The fact remains
that pro-life voters need to win elections to protect mothers and
children.
Further, Democrats are now preparing a billion-dollar election year
barrage with radical abortion as its centerpiece. While Trump did not
commit to any specific pro-life policies, he notably will not stand in
the way of states that have acted to protect innocent children from the
violent abortion industry.
President Trump rightfully praised the end of Roe v. Wade, and
applauded the courage of those Supreme Court justices by name that
courageously overturned that decision. He also exposed the shocking
extremism of “Catholic” Joe Biden, who supports abortion for any
reason, including painful late term abortion.
With your help, we will continue to press President Trump and all our
leaders to do everything possible to defend and protect life.
Political posturing aside, the contrast between Joe Biden and the Democrats and President Trump is unmistakable.
Pro-life voters have only one option in November.
Brian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
AND WHERE ARE ALL OF OUR OTHER CARDINALS ON THIS FOUNDATIONAL MATTER?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
OF ALL THE PROBLEMS FACING OUR AMERICAN LEADERSHP AND THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE, THE QUESTION OF ABORTION REMAINS THE MOST INTRACTIBLE.
The information presented in this Study demonstrates that Americans are critically engaged in trying to solve this problem.
The vast majority are not mindless, soulless. irresponsible.
And in this effort, the Catholic Church must remain the TRUE NORTH, in
its position and in its actions. No equivocation. No vacillation.
GS
Prolife
Leader Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life issued the
following press release today about a new national Priests for
Life/McLaughlin poll of likely voters, probing how the abortion issue
impacts the 2024 elections, both in terms of candidates and ballot
initiatives. Frank is currently attending the CPAC Convention taking
place in National Harbor, Maryland, and is speaking with media there
about he significance of this poll.
New Poll Reveals American Voters Care about “Culture of Life” and Pro-Life Values
Ahead of 2024 Presidential Election
Summary: Results from a new poll
conducted by McLaughlin and Priests for Life show underlying pro-life
sentiment among American voters and widespread bipartisan disapproval
for current political leadership. National Director of Priests for Life
Frank Pavone is calling for an open and honest debate on abortion, as
results show a desire by voters to return to conservative principles in
the upcoming presidential election.
Titusville,
FL, February 22, 2024 – As the nation approaches a pivotal 2024
presidential election, results from a newly-conducted poll by
McLaughlin & Associates, in partnership with leading pro-life
organization Priests for Life, offer critical insight into American
voters’ current priorities, steadfast values, and stance on key issues
like abortion.
Notably,
poll results reveal a majority bipartisan consensus that the country is
not headed in the right direction, general disillusionment with current
political leadership, and an underlying “culture of life” in American
society that conflicts with widespread narratives from the pro-choice
movement.
“This
presidential election holds major significance as the first to take
place since the overturning of Roe v. Wade,” said Frank Pavone,
National Director of Priests for Life. “As our political leaders
actively address the issue of abortion, we at Priests for Life felt the
need to provide them with an update on where Americans stand on the
issue, and how it impacts their voting decision. The results can
encourage candidates not to run away from this issue.
“We
also wanted to provide insight into the types of messaging that might
encourage voters to reject the extreme abortion measures in some states
that seek to amend their constitutions to include abortion rights,”
Pavone added.
Key findings of the poll:
Culture of Life
Poll data shows that there is an underlying pro-life culture in America on a personal level:
- 36% of respondents feel abortion is one of the most important issues affecting their vote.
- 85% support financial, medical, and emotional assistance for women facing unplanned pregnancies.
- 81% support reducing legal and financial barriers to adoption and foster care.
- Sixty-one
percent (61%) of respondents say it’s good when the mother decides to
keep the child and raise the baby themselves, or make an adoption plan.
- By
a margin of 61% to 24%, voters would support a pro-life candidate who
permits some exceptions, but works to assist moms to choose life,
rather than a candidate who does not support any limits on abortion.
- Only
a small percentage of respondents (21%) support an extremist
pro-abortion position of abortion being available anywhere, at any time.
- 77% of voters support ensuring faith-based organizations can help provide services to pregnant women and young mothers.
Political Climate & Public Sentiment
Poll data shows a majority of Americans disapprove of current political leadership and direction of the country:
- 71% of voters feel the country is heading down the wrong track.
- Notably, a majority of Democrat voters (52%), feel the country is heading in the wrong direction.
- 61% of voters disapprove of President Biden.
- Similarly, 57% of voters disapprove of Vice President Harris.
Presidential Candidate Preference and Congressional Approval Ratings
- Donald Trump leads incumbent Joe Biden 46% to 44%, suggesting a desire for a return to more conservative principles and values.
- The
generic approval ratings for Congress show a 48% to 43% lead for the
GOP, indicating a general preference for a change in political
leadership.
*Political Affiliation of Poll Respondents
36% Democrat
36% Republican
28% Independent/Other
More detailed information about the poll conducted by Priests for Life
and McLaughlin & Associates can be requested from
Media@PriestsForLife.org.
“This poll underscores how vital it is to have an honest debate about
abortion in our country,” added Pavone. “It is crucial for our
political leaders and presidential candidates to recognize that most
Americans want less abortion, not more. These results can guide them
and others to engage in meaningful conversation, while having
compassion for different perspectives, and hopefully save lives.”
Frank Pavone will be in attendance at CPAC 2024, taking place in
Washington, D.C., through Feb 24, 2024. For media inquiries, please
contact Leslie at Media@PriestsForLife.org.
Priests for Life
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
IT IS TIME FOR POPE FRANCIS TO EXCOMMUNICATE BIDEN.
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report
Top Stories
• Joe Biden: If Democrats Win Control of Congress, I’ll Sign Bill for Abortions Up to Birth
• Kamala Harris: Christians Can Support Killing Babies in Abortions
• Catholic Pro-Life Group Endorses Donald Trump for President
• Joe Biden Says It’s “Cruel” to Protect Babies From Abortions
More Pro-Life News
• Joe Biden Announces Plans to Kill More Babies in Abortions
• Republican AGs Ask Supreme Court to Protect Women and Babies From Dangerous Abortion Pills
• Premature Girl Born at 26 Weeks is Doing Great Now, She’s “Nothing Short of a Miracle”
• Pastor Greg Laurie: Pro-Life is the Only Biblical Position on Abortion
• Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
REGARDING "ASSISTED SUICIDE", HERE IS A PHYSICIAN, A FATHER AND A MORAL MAN WORTHY OF THOSE TITLES.
And his diagnosis of the problem is RIGHT ON TARGET.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"VENGEANCE IS MINE. I SHALL REPAY" sayeth the LORD. (Romans ll).
Meanwhile, each of us has a role to play.
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report
Top Stories
• 65,464,760 Babies Have Been Killed in Abortions Since Roe v. Wade in 1973
• Argentina President Javier Milei Slams the “Bloody Agenda” of Abortion
• Catholic Bishop Joseph Strickland Will Receive National Pro-Life Award
• Joe Biden is Radically Pro-Abortion and Must be Defeated
More Pro-Life News
• Premature Baby Born at 24 Weeks Was So Tiny His Foot Was the Size of a Fingertip, He’s Thriving Now
• Diaper Company Puts Elon Musk’s Pro-Life Quote on a Times Square Billboard
• Joe Biden’s Number One Issue is Abortion Because Liberals Think Killing Babies Equals Freedom
• People Couldn’t be “Pro-Choice” on Slavery and They Can’t be “Pro-Choice” on Abortion
• Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
WHAT A SHAME. WHAT A SIN.
"Vengeance is Mine. I Shall
Repay, sayeth The Lord". (Romans ll).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
REGARDING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND
ABORTION:
In my opinion, anyone convicted of
such acts should be excommunicated.
And any Public Official who publicly
espouses abortion should be denied Holy Communion.
ENOUGH OF ANY CHURCH EQUIVOCATION ON
THIS MATTER OF HUMAN LIFE AND DEATH.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
When
God Created Man, complete with Free Will and with the guidance of the
Ten Commandments, He also created Heaven and Hell...to accommodate the
Choices of Man.
AND HERE WE ARE....
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
WITH A MORAL AND ETHICAL VOTE ON THIS FOUNDATIONAL ISSUE, YOU WILL ALSO BE VOTING FOR AMERICA'S POLITICAL HEALTH.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
It’s
been eight years since a pro-life investigative journalist released
secretly recorded videos of Planned Parenthood and other abortion
profiteers discussing how the organs of unborn babies are harvested and
sold to tissue brokers, who then resell the parts to research
organizations. The only charges brought in the case were against the
pro-lifer, David Daleiden, his colleague Sandra Merritt and a few other
pro-lifers. As the new Supreme Court term opens in a two weeks,
Daleiden’s attorneys at the Thomas More Society hope the justices will
agree to review the case. ProLife Prime Time News anchors Theresa
Watson and Leslie Palma this week interview Thomas More’s Peter Breen
about the case.Also on the show this week:•
Former Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards has kept a fairly low
profile since stepping away from her million-dollar-a-year job in 2018.
But now she’s back in the news with the launch of an artificial
intelligence Chatbot that will help women find abortion providers and
abortion pills.•
A woman diagnosed with a rare and aggressive brain cancer refused to
abort her unborn child, as doctors recommended. That baby, Gracey, will
turn one next month. Her mom, Tasha Kann, has been given less than a
year to live.•
Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, a 76-year-old Republican, has decided not to
seek re-election in 2024, saying he wants to make way for a new
generation of leaders.•
Priests for Life National Director Frank Pavone and other members of
the Pastoral Team spent a busy summer on the road. Anthony Visone will
report on all their travels•
Some political columnists think Joe Biden could vastly improve his
re-election prospects if he does just one thing: Dump the wildly
unpopular vice president, Kamala Harris.ProLife
PrimeTime News airs every Friday at 9 p.m. ET at EndAbortion.TV and all
the social media platforms linked from there. You also can watch it
right now at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eibxm5m3Y4.Sincerely, Pro-Life Leader Frank PavoneNational Director, Priests for Life - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
"YES, BUT..."
Here the "But" overwhelms
the "Yes".
Abortion, from conception, is the
intentional killing of a human being.
Except in cases of
self-defense...including to save the Life of the mother...that is Murder.
Now let's talk about how to avoid
and to mitigate the effects of this Disaster for all involved.
This Must include the position of
the Catholic Church with regard to non-abortifacient contraception
and with regard to the
"Unitive" function of all sex acts including between committed
married couples.
NOW LET'S TALK.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
THESE ARE NEITHER
"...THE BEST OF TIMES...." NOR "...THE WORST
OF TIMES...."
For GOD CREATED Man in charge of his
own Destiny: Immortal, with Free Will, capable of the greatest Good and the
greatest Evil, and with the ability to choose Heaven or Hell for all Eternity.
What follows is a beautiful description
of One Option.
And then there is the other:
"Vengeance Is Mine; I Shall Repay"...Sayeth The LORD". (ROMANS
II).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
THE ABOMINATION OF ABORTION HAS BEEN
WITH US SINCE BIBLICAL TIMES.
Its deliberation did certainly not
begin aborning a bastard...with neither Legal or Medical or Moral father
in Roe v. Wade.
Now comes an informative article
that brings the discussion up to date with Dobbs and with its effect on
the 2022 mid-term elections.
See: "The Court Wrestles With
Rights", by Daniel Henninger (in WSJ recently).
Like Death and Taxes, this subject
will always be with us, especially given the Catholic Church's continuing
position - even relating to stable
married couples - against even non-abortifacient birth control and
regarding
the "Unitive Function of
Sex".
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
ONE YEAR AFTER THE USSC "DOBBS DECISION" ERASING THE "ROE V. WADE" LEGAL AND MORAL TRAVESTY,
more
and more Americans are starting to think through their position on this
most personal and foundational human choice: the Sanctity of Human
Life.
GS
LifeNews.comTop Stories
- Dobbs Decision Has Saved Over 25,000 Babies From Abortion
- Radical Groups That Support Abortions Up to Birth Endorse Joe Biden for Re-Election
- Joe Biden Will Make Killing Babies in Abortions a Centerpiece of His Re-Election Campaign
- They Said Overturning Roe Would Kill Women. One Year After Dobbs, No Women Died as a Result
More Pro-Life News
- Nancy Pelosi Threatens Pro-Life Americans, There’s a “Price to Pay” for Saving Babies
- 27 Recent Polls Show Americans are Pro-Life on Abortion
- Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves: I’m Glad Our State Led the Way in Overturning Roe v. Wade
- Mike Pence Challenges Republican Presidential Candidates to Protect Babies From Abortion
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
SOME GOOD, AMID A LOT OF EVIL.
GS
More from LifeNews.Com:
Top Stories
- Kamala Harris Calls Pro-Life Americans “Extremists,” Says Killing Babies in Abortion is a “Fundamental Freedom”
- Florida Judge Rules 15-Week Abortion Ban Can Keep Saving Babies
- Pro-Life Leader Defeats Feminists, Who Sued Him for Calling Abortion “Murder”
- Man Confesses to Murdering Catholic Bishop Dave O’Connell
More Pro-Life News
- People Demand Democrat Resign for Saying Abort Disabled Babies to Cut School Costs
- She Was Conceived in Rape But Glad She Wasn’t Aborted. “It’s Good to be Alive!”
- Underground Network Caught Shipping Massive Load of Dangerous Abortion Pills to America
- Planned Parenthood Director Complains Half of Abortion Customers Don’t Show Up When Pro-Life People Pray
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- Jury Finds Mark Houck Not Guilty on Bogus Biden Admin Charges
- Pope Francis Condemns “Throwaway Culture” That Kills Babies in Abortions
- Woman Gave Birth to Twins in Her Bathroom, Then Let Them Starve to Death
- Pro-Life Group Wants Republicans to Investigate 250 Cases of Pro-Abortion Violence
More Pro-Life News
- Abortion Activists Threaten Justice Amy Coney Barrett Outside Her Home: “Cut Her Time Short”
- Texas Governor Greg Abbott Condemns Abortion: “Protect Both Mother and Child”
- Artist Confirms She Created Satanic Statue to Support Killing Babies in Abortions
- Abortion Activists Vandalize Catholic Church’s Pro-Life Banners
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
3- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION MEMBERS ARE
THE TRUE "DEPLORABLES" FOR HAVING PROPOSED THIS IN THE FIRST
PLACE.
Meanwhile: WHERE IS THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH? THE CLERGY'S AMBIGUITY IN THIS CRYSTAL-CLEAR MATTER IS ALSO DEPLORABLE.
GS
As
you may have heard earlier this year, the Biden administration, through
the Department of Health and Human Services, tried to force Christians
in the medical field to perform abortions and sex change surgeries. Our
friends at the Christian Medical and Dental Associations fought back in
federal court and have won! The CMDA was represented by Becket, a
religious freedom law firm.
In August, the 5th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals (right below the U.S. Supreme Court) ruled that the
Biden administration could not do this and that Christian doctors and
nurses with religious objections to killing unborn babies had to be
respected. Interestingly, the lawyers for President Biden and HHS chose
NOT to appeal the decision up to the Supreme Court as the deadline for
this action passed on November 25.
I don’t know why they chose
not to go to the Supreme Court except maybe God blocked it – or they
knew they would lose. Thanks to Christians voting for Donald Trump over
Hillary Clinton in 2016, the Supreme Court was saved from being taken
over by radical leftist judges. I can guarantee this wicked attempt to
force believers to violate their consciences would have been upheld
otherwise.
You can read more about this story on our news
website here: Doctor-defending court ruling praised as "FINAL" after
appeal deadline passed.
Thanks for supporting our work here at AFA! Have a great weekend!
Sincerely,
Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
...AND IF YOU READ THESE REPORTS,
KEEP REPEATING TO YOURSELF: "VENGEANCE IS MINE. I SHALL REPAY",
SAYETH THE LORD".
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
THIS ARTICLE IS MUST-READING IF YOU
WANT TO KNOW THE REAL STORY OF CURRENT POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN THIS
COUNTRY.
And the "January 6
show-trial" is a side-show by comparison - something the mainstream media
will never show you.
See: "The Forest For The
Jan. 6 Trees", by Kimberley A. Strassel (in WSJ Juine 17, 2022,
Opinion, p A15).
"The firebombing is one of an
estimated 24 attacks on pregnancy centers and pro-life groups..."
"In 2021 about 49% of incidents
were perpetrated by people on the far right, and 40% by the far left. The White
House and Democrats are refusing to confront this problem, because it isn't
politically convenient."
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
UNBELIEVABLE.
This nation will never be safe until
the Biden / Schumer / Pelozi Administration is GONE.
GS
One
of the SICKEST abortion bills we've ever seen – legalizing infanticide
up to 28 days AFTER BIRTH – has just passed the full Assembly vote in
California and the first state Senate Committee.
Countless innocent
babies are in danger, even after they're born. This evil bill uses the
term "perinatal," meaning up to FOUR WEEKS AFTER a baby is born.
We
told you the Left is using the leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that
would overturn Roe v. Wade to unleash an unprecedented assault on life,
not only with federal efforts to make Roe permanent, but in the states.
There's even been an assassination attempt on a Supreme Court Justice.
This
is a CRITICAL MOMENT. We're fighting back. We sent a legal letter to
the California Appropriations Committee and the Senate Judiciary
Committee opposing this ghoulish bill.
Now the bill must pass through several other state committees, and we will be there, defending babies. But time is running out.
They need YOU.
Inflation is skyrocketing. Food prices are out of control. Americans are experiencing unprecedented pain at the pump.
Worst
of all, this is INTENTIONAL. President Biden is waging war on American
families to force the radical Left's socialist Green New Deal agenda.
We're
aggressively fighting on Capitol Hill to demand President Biden unleash
American energy and make us energy independent once again.
Stand with us and insist President Biden restore American energy independence and alleviate this economic crisis NOW.
As
ACLJ Senior Counsel for Global Affairs Mike Pompeo's latest blog
explains, American energy independence is the only path forward to
prosperity. Anything else will only result in higher gas prices and
dependence on foreign powers for our energy supply.
Avoiding these
outcomes should be the goal of competent American leadership, but the
Biden Administration continues to pursue the opposite.
The
U.N. Human Rights Council just released a report vilifying Israel for
defending itself and its citizens from violent terrorist attacks.
And there are real fears that President Biden will betray Israel and call for a DIVIDED Jerusalem.
We're
mobilizing our office in Jerusalem to defeat Biden's betrayal and
defend Israel from new lawfare at the International Criminal Court and
at the United Nations.
Sign Our Petition: Defend Israel From Antisemitic Attacks.
God Bless,
The ACLJ Team
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
...AND I WONDER WHY IT TOOK SO LONG FOR THIS WISDOM TO BE "LEAKED".
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
'RES IPSA LOQUITUR".
The thing speaks for itself".
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report
Top Stories
• 26 States Will Ban Abortions When Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade
• House Democrats Block Security Measure to Protect Supreme Court Justices From Pro-Abortion Violence
• Justice Alito Says Supreme Court Not Intimidated by Pro-Abortion Violence: “We’re Doing Our Work”
• Biden Admin Knew of Baby Formula Shortage in February, Failed to Prevent It
More Pro-Life News
• Nancy Pelosi Calls Killing Babies in Abortions “Freedom for Women”
• Pro-Life Group That Leftists Firebombed Now Faces Disturbing Death Threats: “Burn Little Jesus Freaks”
• “Christian” Clergy Bless Abortion Clinic, Claim the “Life of the Fetus” Doesn’t Matter
• Feminist Lawyer Who Argued Roe v. Wade is Outraged Supreme Court Will Likely Overturn It
• Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
ABORTION: A TUTORIAL FOR YOUNG
AND OLD.
- Abortion:
The intentional killing of a human being at any time after conception and
while in the womb. See also "Murder".
- Conception:
The union of a human sperm and human ovum into one human cell, a human
conceptus or embryo or fetus containing all necessary for further human
development.
- Pregnancy:
The State of Human Biology that exists when Conception occurs within the
human body. At that point there exist two human beings developing within
one body.
- "My
Body, My Choice" is an OXYMORON.
- The
attempt to legitimize Abortion in Roe v. Wade was without any basis in
Medicine, in Law and in Morality. Wrong Then. Wrong Now. A
Wrong that must be made Right.
- Whether
in Common Sense, in Reason or under Amendment X of our National
Constitution, this Abomination should be returned to each State of this
Republic for adjudication.
All the rest is "...a tale
as told by an idiot - full of sound and fury, signifying nothing".
Meanwhile, rampant Abortion in this
nation during the last many decades has greatly diminished the structure,
function and reputation particularly of the Black Community.
See: "Why Won't The Left
Talk About Racial Disparities In Abortion?", by Jason L. Riley (in WSJ
May 11, 2022, Opinion, pA17).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
SUNDAY, April 10, 2022
SLAVERY:
AMERICA'S CANCER IN ITS FIRST TWO CENTURIES.
ABORTION: AMERICA'S
CANCER IN ITS SECOND TWO CENTURIES.
(See: "Supreme Court's
Upcoming Abortion Ruling Will Spark Questions On Legality, Access" (in
ctmirror.org, April 10, 2022)
BEWARE:
Historically, democracies have generally survived no more than four centuries
before rotting from within.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
FACT:
IT WAS POPE JOHN PAUL, HIS POLISH COUNTRYMEN, PRESIDENT REAGAN'S UNWAVERING
"PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH",
and the cooperation of these two
giants that brought down the USSR. And, of course, we all PRAYED TO GOD!.
We need that approach again now.
GS
For almost 70 years, the Soviet Union dominated much of Eurasia.
This inhuman ideology swept the world and held it hostage, leaving many hopeless.
Hopeless,
that is, until Pope John Paul returned to his home country Poland—then
under communist rule—, knelt, and kissed the Polish ground. That moment
was arguably the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union.
In
an official (state-enforced) atheistic country, it was surprising to
many to see over a third of Poland’s population gather to see Pope John
Paul’s arrival.
The
Pope rebuked the atheistic stance of the Soviet Union when he said "at
any longitude or latitude of geography, the exclusion of Christ from
the history of man is an act against man."
This was the start of a chain reaction, Patriot. Religion was the undoing of the Soviet Union.
Now, I’m concerned with spiritual leaders in the United States embracing new forms of socialism under Critical Theories.
That’s
why I created the Acton Institute. The Acton Institute is the only
organization dedicated to promoting a free and virtuous society
characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious
principles.
The
Acton Institute is striving to reach spiritual leaders across the
country and work with them, helping them learn the true horrors of
communism and socialism, as well as how important a free market is to
lift people out of poverty.
Together
we can prevent religion and faith from being pushed out of our daily
lives and being replaced with the false deity of socialism.
Patriot,
I am personally asking you to support the Acton Institute. Will you
donate $5, $25, $50, or any generous amount to protect our religious
freedom? Click here to donate.
The Acton Institute believes that:
“Protection
of religious liberty – the first freedom – is essential to any free
society. The freedom of conscience is an inalienable human right given
by our Creator and protected by law.”
As religious leaders work to influence and help their communities, it is up to us to support them in their mission.
Our trainings, seminars, and journals are an intersection between free-market principles and faith.
I
am asking for your help today to expand our programs and teach more
pastors about the economics and morality behind free markets.
Patriot,
will you join me in supporting spiritual leaders and the freedom of
faith? Click any link below to support the Acton Institute today.
Together, we can save our spiritual life in America from falling into the hands of socialists.
Thank you,
Rev. Robert A. Sirico
President Emeritus
Acton Institute
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
A LOT TO BE THANKFUL FOR IN THESE ACTIONS.
Meanwhile, pray for the USSC.
GS
Today
is the Day of the Unborn Child!! See Fr. Frank Pavone's article
below for more information about this special day.
One
of the pro-life events in observance of the Day of the Unborn Child is
the International Gift of Life Walk in New York City. Please keep the
participants, including a busload of marchers from Westchester-Putnam
RIght to Life, in your prayers.
Also,
Mary's Crusade for Life begins today, the same day on which Pope
Francis, in union with the Catholic bishops, will consecrate Russia and
Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. For more information, visit
lifecrusade.org.
May God bless you all - and may He bless our unborn brothers and sisters everywhere!!
Yours for life,
Gerald (Gerry) Yeung
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something to Celebrate: The Day of the Unborn Child
By Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life
3/21/2022
Published in Marriage & Family
In
1995, then-Pope John Paul II published his encyclical letter Evangelium
Vitae on March 25, the Feast of the Annunciation. It was not a
coincidence he chose that day.
This
feast marks the moment at which the Incarnation took place. At Mary's
"Fiat," God began existing in a human nature - a human nature at the
earliest stages of its development within Mary's body. God's
incarnation began as an unborn child. Nine months to the day later we
celebrate the birth of Christ on Christmas.
"Mary's
consent at the Annunciation and her motherhood stand at the very
beginning of the mystery of life which Christ came to bestow on
humanity," the pope noted in the encyclical.
It's
also no coincidence that March 25 was chosen as the Day of the Unborn
Child, a day we recommit ourselves to love and serve the weakest among
us.
The
Day of the Unborn Child has been officially established in many
nations, in some cases by the Church and in other cases by the civil
government. Elsewhere, the day is observed by individuals, families,
and organizations.
The
celebration of March 25 as the Day of the Unborn Child was first
recognized in El Salvador in 1993 and has grown rapidly. In 2003, the
first Provida International Congress in Madrid with representation from
over 20 countries in Europe and the Americas institutionalized March
25th as International Day of Life. Since then, the day has grown in
popularity. The countries recognizing it include Argentina, Guatemala,
Chile, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Dominican Republic, Uruguay,
Panama, Peru, Slovakia, Cuba, Austria, Philippines and Romania.
Observance
of the day in the United States has been carried by pro-life groups.
Priests for Life has organized a coalition of dozens of national
pro-life leaders to publicize and promote the Day of the Unborn Child.
In our joint statement (see www.DayOfTheUnborn.com), we suggest several
ways that individuals, families and church groups can observe the day,
even at this last minute, including:
- Spiritually adopt an unborn child and pray for him and his mother for nine months.
- Offer a Mass, Holy Hour or a prayer vigil for life.
- Pray outside an abortion clinic. The 40 Days for Life Campaign is a good way to get involved this way.
- Host a pro-life movie night for friends and family members.
People also can pray, individually or together, a prayer I wrote to the Unborn Child Jesus:
Redeemer in the Womb
Lord
Jesus Christ, we thank you that when Mary, your Mother, said "Yes" at
the Annunciation, You took our human nature upon Yourself. You shared
our life and death, our childhood and adulthood.
You
also shared our time in the womb. While still God, while worshiped and
adored by the angels, while Almighty and filling every part of the
universe, You dwelt for nine months in the womb of Mary. You were our
Redeemer in the womb, our God who was a preborn child.
Lord
Jesus, we ask You to bless and protect the children who today are in
their mothers' womb. Save them from the danger of abortion.
Give
their mothers the strength, like Mary, to say "Yes" to you. Give them
grace to sacrifice themselves, in body and soul, for their children.
Help
all people to recognize in the preborn child a brother, a sister, saved
by You, our Redeemer in the womb, who live and reign forever and ever.
Amen.
The
United States has a pro-life movement to which the rest of the world
looks up. Let's continue to lead the way, by celebrating with vigor the
Day of the Unborn Child!
Father
Frank Pavone is national director of Priests for Life and the national
pastoral director of Rachel's Vineyard Ministries and the Silent No
More Awareness Campaign. The books he has authored include Abolishing
Abortion and Proclaiming the Message of Life.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
A PLEA...FOR LIFE.
GS
From the Desk of Dr. Ben Carson:
Hello,
I
feel like our culture has forgotten—or ignored—some very important and
basic lessons when it comes to the development of human life.
Our
society has been infected by an anti-life ideology, treating its most
vulnerable members as disposable objects. Abortion that was once
thought of as a last resort in a medical emergency has become the new
normal.
Medicine tells us that life begins
at the moment of conception. It also tells us when an unborn baby
develops a heartbeat, brainwaves, and nervous system. Yet, despite all
of this, the unborn are not treated as though they are alive or even
human.
As a surgeon, I have operated on infants pre-birth. I can assure you that they are very much alive.
Dr. Ben Carson, Founder and Chairman of American Cornerstone Institute
Life
is a precious gift that has been given to us from our creator. No
person is disposable, and every life is precious according to Him.
I
believe that everyone deserves life, even those who have been denied
this right by our society. I believe that together we can make a
difference and bring dignity and a voice to the unborn. I also believe
that I’m not alone in this belief.
I believe that you believe that too.
I’ve
started working with a group of like-minded individuals who are looking
to change our culture. We want to build a society that values life but
that takes people like you and I making a commitment.
The
first step is clearly stating what we believe and what we are willing
to do to protect the lives of the unborn. Will you join me today and
stand up for those who cannot do it for themselves?
I’ve
created a new pro-life pledge; I’d love your support. Would you read
the pledge below to see if you align with our shared goals and are
willing to commit to fighting for the lives of the unborn?
https://offers.americancornerstone.org/pro-life-statement/
Regards,
Dr. Ben Carson
Founder & Chairman
American Cornerstone Institute
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
...AND PRAY AS YOU'VE NEVER PRAYED
BEFORE.
GS
Today
marks a SOLEMN DAY for our nation – the grim anniversary of Roe v. Wade
– when the Supreme Court manufactured a "right" to abortion.
49
years and over 60 million babies who have paid the ultimate price
later, we continue to mourn. But we also redouble our efforts to defend
life. Never have we been closer to overturning Roe v. Wade.
But
as President Biden defends the abortion industry at the Supreme Court
and uses your tax dollars to expand abortion, it is clear that the ACLJ
is needed now more than ever. We are the LAST LINE OF DEFENSE in court.
We've
filed 3 critical amicus briefs at the Supreme Court (our most EVER) to
overturn Roe v. Wade and defend countless babies. We're involved in
multiple new cases around the country to defeat the abortion industry
and save babies.
THIS is the moment. Let's make this the LAST anniversary of Roe.
We can help SAVE BABIES' LIVES. But we face a daunting challenge. We urgently need your tax-deductible support.
Momentum
for life is building as the Supreme Court JUST refused to block the
Texas abortion ban for a SECOND TIME. But the fight is far from over.
Planned Parenthood is still literally celebrating.
The
Roe v. Wade decision enabled it and other abortionists to build
billion-dollar empires from taking the lives of unborn babies.
This
horrific day is no cause for celebration. At the ACLJ, we are directly
involved in a case at the Supreme Court that could strike down Roe v.
Wade and trigger a chain reaction across the country and save countless
babies.
The ACLJ has filed THREE CRITICAL BRIEFS in the Supreme
Court case that could undo Roe v. Wade and spell disaster for the
abortion industry.
Abortion is not healthcare, and it is not a right
listed anywhere in the Constitution. And each of our briefs pointed out
exactly that, among the many other legal fallacies of Roe v. Wade.
Afghanistan
was just designated the most dangerous country for Christians in the
world by a leading persecution watch group. President Biden's weakness
and incompetence allowed the Taliban to return to power, putting
innocent Christians in extreme danger.
We filed a lawsuit
against FOUR Biden Agencies over their abandonment of Afghan
Christians, but the Biden Administration just asked the court for more
time to respond.
Christians in Afghanistan don't have more time. They need protection NOW.
From
Build Back Better to an attempt to take over elections, this week saw
major losses for the Biden Administration. During a press conference,
President Biden cast doubt on the legitimacy of the upcoming 2022
elections. And the President all but invited Russia to invade Ukraine.
God Bless,
The ACLJ Team
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Top
Stories
• 63,459,781 Babies Have Been Killed in Abortions Since Roe v.
Wade in 1973
• Texas
Defends Abortion Ban in Federal Court, Heartbeat Law Has Saved Over 10,000
Babies From Abortion
• South
Dakota Gov Kristi Noem: We Must “Protect the Life of Every Unborn Child”
• LISTEN: Clinic Covers Up Botched Abortion on 911 Call By
Pretending to be Woman’s Mom
More
Pro-Life News
• Dog Saves Abandoned
Newborn Baby, Protecting Her Like One of Her Puppies
• Military is Trying
to Boot Christian “Extremists” From Its Ranks
• Principal Raped Teen
Girl, Planned Parenthood Aborted Her Baby and Sent Her Back to Him
• Connecticut Will
Send COVID Patients to Nursing Homes Despite Previous Orders Killing 50,000
Elderly People
• Scroll Down for
Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
AND THE DRUM-BEAT GOES ON...THE PLAGUE OF THE MODERN WORLD.
"Vengeance is Mine. I shall repay, sayeth The Lord". (Romans II).
GS
Top
Stories
• Abortion Was the Leading Cause of Death Worldwide in 2021,
Killing 42.6 Million People
• Andrew
Cuomo Won’t Faces Charges for Order That Killed 15,000 Nursing Home Residents
• Prenatal
Tests Wrong 85% of the Time, But They’re Used to Kill “Disabled” Babies in
Abortions
• Newborn Baby Boy Doing Well After Mother Abandoned Him in
Airplane Toilet
More
Pro-Life News
• Planned Parenthood
Abortion Center Burns Down, No Babies Will be Killed in Abortions
• Catholics Outraged
After Bishops Say They Have No Conscience Right to Reject COVID Vaccine
• Abortion Survivor
Speaks Out: The Abortion Pill Was Supposed to Kill Me, “However I Survived”
• Pro-Abortion Group
Complains 2021 Was the “Worst Year for Abortion in Almost Half a Century”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
JUST SO YOU KNOW....
"VENGEANCE IS MINE. I SHALL REPAY", sayeth The Lord. (Romans 2).
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News ReportThursday, December 23, 2021
Top Stories• 2021 Was a Record Pro-Life Year: 19 States Passed 106 Laws Saving Babies From Abortion• Catholic Bishop: Illinois Gov is “Evil” for Signing Law Allowing Secret Abortions on Teens• Ohio Gov Mike DeWine Signs Bill to Require Life-Saving Treatment for Babies Who Survive Abortions• Liberals Call Texas Abortion Ban an Attack on Free Speech, But Abortions Permanently Silence Unborn BabiesMore Pro-Life News• Pro-Life Leader Sue Thayer Passes Away, Former Planned Parenthood Director Exposed Its Greedy Abortion Business• Killing Babies for Profit: Planned Parenthood CEOs’ Salaries Jumped 89% Since 2011• Planned Parenthood Endorses 200 Members of Congress in Desperate Bid to Keep Nancy Pelosi in Control• Feminists Launch Campaign to Shuttle Women to Mexico for Abortions, Smuggle Dangerous Abortion Pills Into America• Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
ROE V WADE: AN ABOMINATION ALMOST AS GREAT AS THE ABORTION OF A HUMAN BEING ITSELF.
I have been saying and writing this ever since that result "emanated" from the bowels of the USSC in 1973.
That
has not been the only execrable emanation from our national "supreme"
Court since its founding. But it is the worst and the most
consequential. And it certainly does not represent the "Will of the
People".
To better understand what has actually been taking
place in this vital matter - a matter of life and death - please read
the following in toto. THEN MAKE AN EXAMINATION OF CONSCIENCE. Your
eternal life may depend on the outcome.
"What Pro-Lifers Want", by William McGurn (in WSJ November 30, 2021, Opinion, p A19).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
NO COMMENT...THAT'S PRINTABLE.
Or should I use someone else's comment that is printable:
"I HOPE THEY GET A PERMANENT CASE OF JOCK-ITCH."
GS
“I'll f***ing keep killing babies!”
That’s
what a pro-abortion protester yelled at one of our pro-life leaders
earlier this month as she stomped on and tore up our Cemetery of
Innocents display – nearly 3,000 bright pink Christian crosses set up
to commemorate the lives lost to abortion each day in America – at the
Catholic St. Louis University in Missouri.
This was far from an isolated incident.
At
the University of Texas-San Antonio, our pro-life leaders were spit on,
yelled at, and hit in the face by pro-abortion radicals protesting our
Cemetery of Innocents display.
At the University of San Diego, a pro-abortion mob tried to shut down my recent speaking event.
I could tell you thousands of stories like these our team has racked up across the nation.
As the saying goes, you know you’re over the target when you’re taking flak.
And in recent years, Students for Life has been taking a lot of flak.
The
truth is, the Abortion Lobby and their foot soldiers know they’re
losing the argument over abortion, so they’re resorting to anything –
including violence to shut us up.
But with your support, we aren’t backing down.
george,
as you may know, these next few weeks between now and the end of the
year are the most critical of the entire year for Students for Life’s
fundraising.
That’s why a
handful of generous Students for Life supporters have stepped up to
MATCH every gift that we receive by the #GivingTuesday (November 30th)
deadline dollar-for-dollar up to $150,000!
So,
will you please click here to make your most generous tax-deductible
contribution of $25, $50, $100, $250, or more right away?
Every
gift will be instantly DOUBLED thanks to this $150,000 #GivingTuesday
Matching Grant, so there’s never been a better time to give!
Pro-abortion protesters have become more radical than ever.
The days of the “safe, legal, and rare” LIE are long gone.
Now,
Planned Parenthood, NARAL, Hollywood, and pro-abortion members of the
national media are encouraging young women to proudly “Shout Your
Abortion” on social media.
And this week, I saw the hashtag #AbortionIsEssential trending on social media after a coordinated push by the Abortion Lobby.
But
with your support, Students for Life is fighting back against this
culture of death where it matters most: on America’s high school and
college campuses.
You see,
young women aged 18-24 are Planned Parenthood’s most coveted
demographic because they obtain roughly HALF of all abortions every
year in the United States.
Sadly,
many young people today are fed pro-abortion propaganda from childhood
by government schools, our culture, and the national media.
But
when they see our displays – like the Cemetery of Innocents display I
outlined above, or get to hold one of our preborn baby models in their
hands, or see what a preborn baby really looks like at 15 weeks into a
pregnancy in lifelike detail with our virtual reality goggles – their
minds are INSTANTLY changed for life.
That’s the good news.
The bad news is, there are SOOO many more young people we need to reach with our pro-life message.
That’s
why I’m praying you’ll please consider making a generous tax-deductible
contribution before the deadline on our $150,000 #GivingTuesday
Matching Grant.
With 1,250
active pro-life campus groups across the nation, no other pro-life
organization is having more one-on-one conversations with the young
people Planned Parenthood covets most than Students for Life of America.
And
with your support for our $150,000 #GivingTuesday Matching Grant,
Students for Life will continue to change minds and save lives by:
*** Reaching 1,350 on-campus chapters by the end of this spring semester.
Our
Students for Life chapters are invaluable to helping us reach new young
people for the pro-life cause, which is why pro-abortion students,
faculty and administrators are going all out to stop our ability to
speak out for life. But the more they try to muzzle our message, the
stronger we become!
*** Training students on how to deal with censorship, pro-abortion threats, and cyber-bullying.
The
University of Northern Iowa tried to stop us from forming a campus
chapter, claiming we were a “hate group!” You’ve seen the recent
protests my mere presence on campus has generated for my speaking tour.
And I get texts on a daily basis from pro-life students who have their
displays vandalized by pro-abortion radicals. We have to equip our
students with how to deal with this kind of madness.
*** Hosting our Second National Pro-Life Summit this January.
As
thousands of young people travel to Washington, D.C. for the National
Pro-Life March in January, we’re hosting a robust day of training and
fellowship for more than 2,000 young people and grassroots pro-life
activists – and thousands more online. Our goal is to show them how to
make an impact for life at the federal, state, and local level;
*** Kicking Planned Parenthood off Christian Campuses.
Sadly,
Students for Life has identified more than two-dozen Christian colleges
who currently maintain relationships with Planned Parenthood and the
abortion industry. We can’t allow young Christians to be co-opted by
Planned Parenthood if we’re ever going to end abortion in the United
States. Our team is preparing to release a massive report on this right
before Christmas.
*** Reaching more than 400,000 people through our “Campaign for Abortion Free Cities.”
We’ll
knock on at least 396,000 doors, have 31,680 conversations, and form 85
church partnerships all designed to spread our pro-life message. We’ll
be saving lives in the process, hurting Planned Parenthood’s bottom
line massively. And fewer dollars for Planned Parenthood weakens their
political power.
For Life,
Kristan Hawkins
President, Students for Life of America
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY, September 26, 2021
"VENGEANCE IS MINE. I SHALL REPAY, SAYETH THE LORD". (ROMANS 2).
I have to keep reminding myself of this.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for TUESDAY through THURSDAY, September 14 through 16, 2021
AS CLEAR AS CAN BE.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for FRIDAY, September 10, 2021
WE ARE ENTERING ANOTHER ERA OF CONTROL, DESTRUCTION AND DEATH.
We have been here before. It was called the 20th century.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
LifeNews.com
Pro-Life News Report
Wednesday, September 8, 2021
Top Stories
- Whoopi Goldberg: It’s My Right as a Christian Parent to Have My Grandchild Killed in an Abortion
- Joe Biden: “Next Republican Who Tells Me I’m Not Religious, I’ll Shove My Rosary Beads Down Their Throat”
- Kamala Harris: Killing Babies in Abortions is a “Value We Hold Dear”
- AOC is So Scientifically Inept She Calls Men “Menstruating Persons,” Thinks They Can Give Birth
More Pro-Life News
- Planned Parenthood CEO: Saving Babies From Abortion is “Cruel,” Dismembering Them is OK
- Angry Abortion Activists Vandalize Catholic Church After Texas Bans Abortion
- Texas Abortion Clinic Director Celebrates Killing 67 Babies in Abortions in 17 Hours
- Mother Teresa: “The Greatest Destroyer of Peace is Abortion”
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY, August 29, 2021
THIS *president IS A PRETENDER TO HIGH OFFICE AND ALSO TO *catholicism...
to his unending SHAME.
GS
Joe Biden Has Blood on His Hands
The
world watched in horror this past week after more than a dozen American
soldiers were killed and over a dozen were injured in Afghanistan. And
now members of Congress and millions of Americans are calling on Joe
Biden to resign or be impeached because of how he botched the
withdrawal of American troops and people.
Biden botched it so badly it appears he gave little regard to these people's lives.
But for pro-life Americans, this is NOT surprising?
Why?
Because Joe Biden is already the most pro-abortion president in American history. He already has blood on his hands.
Biden
has gone far past any president before him in terms of promoting
abortion and forcing pro-life Americans to be a part of it. Like other
presidents, Biden has made Americans fund the Planned Parenthood
abortion business here in the United States and its abortion agenda
across the globe. He's funded the UNFPA with our tax dollars, which
supports population control in China. And he's overturned pro-life
rules President Trump put in place to protect the conscience rights of
pro-life medical professional.
But Biden is even more aggressively pro-abortion.
He
is the first president to actively work with abortion activists in
Congress to try to repeal the Hyde Amendment and the legislation he and
Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi put together is in the Senate and could
make Americans fund hundreds of thousands of abortions every year.
LifeNews.com
is on the front lines fighting Biden, Pelosi and their radical abortion
agenda each and every day. Not only will LifeNews.com keep standing
against their radical abortion policies, but we will work hard to
replace them -- to take back Congress next year and take back the White
House!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for WEDNESDAY, August 11, 2021
WITH "EXECUTIVE ACTIONS" LIKE THIS AND THOSE AT THE NATIONAL BORDER,
the *Biden administration is rapidly becoming A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY through FRIDAY, August 2 through 6, 2021
DAMNABLE,
BY THE DAMNED. ONLY A USSC HOLDING THAT HUMAN LIFE BEGINS AT THE MOMENT
OF CONCEPTION, AND IS PROTECTED FROM THAT MOMENT, WILL SUFFICE.
GS
Subject: University Admits Harvesting Kidneys From Unborn Babies While Their Hearts are Still Beating
University Admits Harvesting Kidneys From Unborn Babies While Their Hearts are Still Beating
The
University of Pittsburgh may have inadvertently provided more evidence
this week that aborted babies may be being born alive and left to die
so that their organs may be used for scientific research, according to
the Center for Medical Progress.
https://www.lifenews.com/2021/08/05/university-admits-harvesting-kidneys-from-unborn-babies-while-their-hearts-are-still-beating/
LifeNews.com is a very good source of prolife info.
This is on the level of Nazi doctor Josef Mengele.
For Life,
Tom Byrne
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report
Top Stories
- President Trump Slams Joe Biden: “One of the Most Extreme and Radical Presidents We’ve Had”
- Gov Ron DeSantis Condemns Abortion: We Must Do “Everything We Can to Protect the Unborn”
- President Donald Trump Launches New Web Site to Communicate With Conservatives
- Scientists Use Scalps From Aborted Babies to Create “Humanized Mice” and Fauci is Funding It
More Pro-Life News
- Ted Cruz: Americans Don’t Want Biden and Harris and Their Radical Pro-Abortion Views
- Scientists are Using Livers From Babies Killed in Second-Trimester Abortions for Research
- Iowa Constitutional Amendment Would Declare There’s No Right to Kill Babies in Abortions
- Planned Parenthood Wants to Keep Killing Babies Even Though Lubbock, Texas Voted to Ban Abortions
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY and TUESDAY, January 11 and 12, 2021
THE STATE OF THE DISUNION.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for TUESDAY through THURSDAY, December 31,
2020
I RARELY POST A SOLICITATION...BUT THIS IS MORE THAN THAT.
This is my most harsh indictment, consistent with my Faith, on the
"dissembling miscreants" occupying many of our colleges...students, teachers and parents who subscribe to these actions.
GS
I’m worried, george.
You and I have made so much progress towards abolishing abortion over the last four years.
But
now I’m afraid with the political winds shifting in Washington, D.C.,
the Abortion Lobby and their pals could be out for political payback.
You
see, this fall, one of our campus groups at the University of Northern
Iowa was labeled a “hate group” by the Student Government.
During
the virtual meeting in which they BANNED our pro-life group from
campus, one student senator stated, “There are opinions. And there are
opinions that get people killed in many cases.”
But this student
wasn’t speaking in defense of our group and the countless preborn
babies that are put to death each day by abortion…quite the opposite!
He was attacking US for being pro-life and for wanting to SAVE preborn babies from abortion!
This
is the type of madness I’m afraid we’re running into more and more on
America’s campuses. The pro-abortion Left knows they’re losing the
argument over abortion, so they’re trying to stop us from even being
allowed to argue!
And they’ll stoop to any means necessary to shut us up and shut us down.
In
fact, not long ago at a rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court, one of
our pro-life students was punched in the face by a pro-abortion
protester simply for expressing her support of President Trump’s pick
of now-Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
We’ve faced bomb threats,
violent assaults, vandalism, and been called every name in the book at
the hands of pro-abortion protesters.
george, the pro-abortion
radicals’ new blueprint is to slap the term “hate group” on our
pro-life groups so they can justify censorship and even violence
against us.
Today, I’m reaching out because my staff tells me you haven’t yet renewed your support for Students for Life for 2021.
If you already sent in your renewed support and I just missed it – thank you!
But
if you haven’t yet done so, will you please click here to renew your
support for Students for Life with your most generous contribution of
$10, $25, $50, $100, $250, or more right away?
If you give
before tonight’s deadline, your contribution will be automatically
DOUBLED thanks to our $160,000 End of Year Matching Grant…so please
hurry!
My goal is to DOUBLE DOWN on all of our critical programs in 2021. Your renewed support will help Students for Life:
***
Reach 1,325 on-campus chapters by the end of this spring semester. Our
Students for Life chapters are invaluable to helping us reach new young
people for the pro-life cause, which is why pro-abortion students,
faculty and administrators are going all out to stop our ability to
speak out for life. But the more they try to muzzle our message, the
stronger we become!
*** Train students on how to deal with
censorship and pro-abortion threats and cyber-bullying. As you may have
seen, the University of Northern Iowa tried to stop us from forming a
campus chapter, claiming we were a “hate group!” We have to arm our
students to deal with this kind of madness;
*** Launch our
#Stand4Life week of activism during the Roe v. Wade anniversary this
January. This will hit 18+ cities across the country including
Washington, D.C. We need a HUGE turnout this week to show the U.S.
Supreme Court we’re insisting they act on Roe v. Wade;
*** Kick
Planned Parenthood off campus. We’ve identified at least 54 Christian
and Catholic colleges who have developed relationships with Planned
Parenthood or promote abortion in other ways. After pressuring school
administrators, 17 schools severed ties with the Abortion Goliath. But
we won’t stop until 100% of Christian schools kick Planned Parenthood
off campus; and
*** Expand on-campus showings of Unplanned.
We’re hoping to show this film on 300 college campuses. This film
exposes the TRUTH about the abortion monsters from the point of view of
former Planned Parenthood director, Abby Johnson, who’s since become a
pro-life activist.
Of course, unlike the butchers at Planned Parenthood, Students for Life doesn’t receive a dime in taxpayer money.
There
are no Hollywood celebrities lining up to host black tie fundraisers
and we certainly can’t count on the national media to give us a fair
shake.
100% of our support comes from the voluntary gifts of pro-lifers like you.
So,
george, will you please prayerfully consider renewing your support for
2021 by making your most generous end-of-year contribution possible?
As
I mentioned, thanks to a handful of generous supporters, every dollar I
can raise before MIDNIGHT TONIGHT, will be MATCHED dollar-for-dollar up
to $160,000!
There’s no set renewal amount. Some supporters are giving as much as $1,000, $500, or $100.
If
that’s too much right know, I understand it’s out of reach for many
people. But I do hope you’ll at least consider matching our average
gift of $38.
With the End of Year Matching Grant, a gift of $38 would really make $76 worth of impact!
Whatever
you decide, please act right away. The End of Year deadline is rapidly
approaching and I need to finalize all of our plans as we head into the
New Year.
For Life,
Kristan Hawkins
President, Students for Life
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for TUESDAY, December 22,
2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY, September 18,
2020
ARE PEOPLE OF FAITH, OF ANY FAITH EXCEPT PERHAPS ISLAM, REALLY
QUESTIONING THE POSITION, ACTIONS AND BONA FIDES OF PRESIDENT TRUMP
REGARDING FAITH AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION?
On what planet have you been residing during the last four years?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY, September 14,
2020
ANOTHER BLOW TO THE "DISSEMBLING MISCREANTS"
WHO SUPPORT ABORTION.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, September 1 and 2,
2020
WILL THIS NIGHTMARE EVER END?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
TUESDAY,
April 28,
2020
'LEST WE FORGET:
This is face of the Democratic Party.
GS
To read the news, visit LifeNews.com.Top Stories
• Joe Biden Calls Killing Babies in Abortions “Essential Health Care That Cannot be Delayed”
• Liberal Reporter to President Trump: Do You Deserve Re-Election After Killing 55,000 Americans?
• Hillary Clinton Endorses Pro-Abortion Joe Biden, Who Supports Abortions Up to Birth
• Catholic Bishop Slams Gov Gretchen Whitmer: Killing Babies in Abortions is Not “Life-Sustaining”
More Pro-Life News
• Tara Reade Slams Joe Biden: “You Claim to Champion Women’s Rights,” But You Sexually Assaulted Me
• Liberal Media Doesn’t Ask Women Who May be Joe Biden’s VP About Sexual Assault Allegations
• Governor Ralph Northam Ordered Churches Closed But Let Abortion Clinics Kill Babies
• Criminal Charges Dismissed Against Elderly Pro-Lifer for Praying Outside Abortion Clinic
• Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Resposne for SUNDAY,
March 22,
2020
"PANDEMIC": YOU'VE HAD ONE FOR MANY DECADES.
GS
LifeNews.com
How extreme are radical abortion activists?
They
are doing everything they can to exploit the coronavirus and kill more
babies in abortions and force you to fund abortions with your tax
dollars.
Last week, as members of Congress pushed for
legislation to help Americans dealing with the virus and the negative
economic fallout, pro-abortion Speaker Nancy Pelosi put together a
stimulus bill that would have forced Americans to pay for killing
babies in abortions.
President Trump's staff and pro-life lead
Here
at LifeNews.com we immediately sounded the alarm and our news story on
how Pelosi was caught reached millions of people and was shared almost
half a million times on Facebook.
Thankfully, Pelosi was forced
to back down and Congress eventually passed a bill with pro-life
protections to make sure you aren't required to fund abortions!
Meanwhile,
state after state is taking every precaution possible to protect
Americans from getting the coronavirus. States like California,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Louisiana, and others have issued orders to stop
elective surgeries to save medical staff and resources to treat
patients diagnosed with the virus.
There is no more elective surgery that is complete and totally medically NOT necessary that killing a baby in an abortion!
LifeNews
has uncovered and reported on how Planned Parenthood abortion clinics
TODAY are defying those mandates and are continuing to kill innocent
unborn children in abortions!
Thankfully, in a story LifeNews
broke yesterday, the Ohio Attorney General has stepped up and is
demanding that abortion clinics in his state stop killing babies
because abortion is not necessary health care. But abortion clinics in
every other state continue to kill unborn children.
Finally, three's Joe Biden.
While
our families were beginning to deal with the virus last weekend
beginning to understand the meaning of "social distancing," Joe Biden
was telling Americans about his plans to expand abortion.
Biden
wants to make you and me pay for millions of abortions. he wants to
overturn every pro-life law nationwide that saves babies, and he wants
to pack the Supreme Court with more pro-abortion judges.
Whether
it's Nancy Pelosi, Planned Parenthood or Joe Biden, pro-abortion
extremists will stop at nothing to impose their abortion agenda on
America -- even if that means exploiting and international health
crisis to do so.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
I
HAVE BEEN DISAPPOINTED WITH THE PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP OF THE AMERICAN
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS FOR
DECADES.
I have been outraged with the leadership of the American
College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and their pro-abortion position
for at least as long.
SHAME!
See the following article:
"The Ob-Gyn's Who Play Politics With Women"s Lives", by Christina Francis (in WSJ March 4, 2020, Opinion, pA17).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SATURDAY,
January 25,
2020
THERE ARE DIVISIONS AMONG
CATHOLICS REGARDING SOME CATHOLIC DOCTRINES / "DOCTRINES". BUT THERE IS
NO DIVISION REGARDING THE CATHOLIC CHURCH POSITION ON ABORTION BY ANY
MEANS...NEVER, except to save the life of the mother!
ARE YOU A CATHOLIC...OR A MALIGN HYPOCRITE?
THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY,
March 11,
2019
YES, CHRISTIANS...AND SO MANY MORE ARE NEEDED...
GS
I’m appalled. The Senate voted in favor of murdering freshly born babies.
The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, reintroduced to the Senate last week, failed by a vote of 53 to 44.
The
Senate could not even come close to agreeing that born-alive babies do
not deserve execution. In fact, all of the prominent Democratic 2020
Presidential hopefuls joined forces to block the act.
If I were taking our nation’s temperature, the thermometer would show that the fever just spiked. America is severely ill.
If
we cannot protect babies with a law prohibiting the onslaught of
infanticide, then we will be on the wrong side of history and it’s only
a matter of time before our society slides into an irrepressible
decline.
It’s
clear, our moral compass as a nation is severely damaged. It’s bad
enough that states like Vermont and Illinois are following the lead of
New York by introducing bills that would permit abortion up until
birth, and now we are killing babies OUTSIDE the womb.
The only remedy for our nation is for Christians to boldly rise up and take action.
There is a movement in our country that is spreading like cancer and it seeks to destroy biblical values.
This is why we MUST mobilize 90-million Christians now to stand for life! We cannot wait.
Our
team at My Faith Votes has put together a three-part plan that’s going
into effect now, but we need your donations to make it possible.
•
We’re leveraging leading Christian voices to create compelling videos
for social media platforms and TV public service announcements to reach
unengaged Christians to stand for life.
•
We’re organizing communication between Christians and their elected
officials to keep the pressure on. They need to feel the power of
90-million Christians holding them accountable.
•
Lastly, My Faith Votes is working directly with the new pro-life film,
Unplanned, releasing on March 29 to ensure every person who sees the
movie has the ability to connect, engage and start taking action for
life.
We must continue to oppose the evil that values the convenience of choice over the sanctity of life.
Will
you please stand with us now to defend life? The abortion movement is
so intense it’s gaining traction every single day, and it must be
stopped.
United. We Stand.
Gov. Mike Huckabee
Honorary National Chairman
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY and TUESDAY,
February 25 and 26,
2019
WHAT CAN I SAY ON THIS SUBJECT THAT I HAVE NOT ALREADY SAID?
NOTHING. BUT I WILL KEEP SAYING IT.
Abortion
is an Abomination, mainly the direct consequence of many women and
ladies degenerating into simply soul-less genetic females, always the
most dangerous of any species.
Now it is I who must say: "Wha Hoppen?"
Only God knows. "Vengeance Is Mine. I Shall Repay, Sayeth the Lord".
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY,
February 17,
2019
CONTRARY TO THE FEVERED CHARGES OF SOME LEFTISTS,
it is the Left that is using tactics very reminiscent of the early years of the Nazi regime.
The latest is this, the indoctrination of young children.
WAKE UP, AMERICA.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for WEDNESDAY, January 23,
2019
MORE NEWS YOU WON'T SEE OR HEAR IN THE "MAINSTREAM MEDIA".
Journalism
is not yet dead, but its prognosis us very serious. Not much time left
to treat this disease, before it becomes The Ministry of Propaganda.
GS
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News ReportTop Stories
- New York Senate Passes Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth
- Covington Catholic Forced to Close After Students and Staff Receive Death Threats
- Planned Parenthood Celebrates 61 Million Abortions Under Roe, Wants Abortion Legal Up to Birth
- Here’s The Response From Nick Sandmann of Covington Catholic High School “Correcting the Outright Lies”
More Pro-Life News
- Pro-Life Teens Face Death Threats After Media, Liberals Falsely Smear Them as Racists
- President Trump Supports Pro-Life Teens: “They’ve Become Symbols of Evil Fake News”
- MSNBC Calls Pro-Life Teens Racist, Compares Them to Nazis and KKK
- Pro-Life Teens Speak Out Against Media Smear Campaign: We’ve Been Doxxed and Threatened With Violence
- Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY through TUESDAY,
December 16 through 18,
2018
JUST SO YOU KNOW: THERE IS A GOD; AND THERE IS A HELL.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY,
November 18,
2018
ABORTION:
THE NUMBER 1 IMPEDIMENT TO A UNITED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Well over 70% of Americans are opposed to the intentional killing of a
human being, from the moment of conception through natural death.
The USSC case of Roe v. Wade was a political Holding with no basis in
Law, in Medicine, and in Morality/ Ethics.
Any (very unlikely) reversal of that obstruction of Justice would only
turn the question back to the individual States.
The matter is meanwhile gradually returning to those individual States,
as noted in the article by Ana Radelat (in http://www.ctmirror.org,
Nov. 16, 2018): "Access
Health Ct to Protest New Trump Abortion Proposal". In this
process, pro-Abortionists are becoming ever more rabid in their lethal
efforts. As evidence of what they have achieved already, see: "Induced
Abortion By Woman's Age - New York State 2016 (PDF)",
reproduced here.
Read it and Weep. And then get Very Angry...and Fight for the only
position supportable in Law, in Medicine, and in Morality / Ethics.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
GOD BLESS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION,
finally a bright spot in the swamp of immoral pro-abortionists.
"Vengeance Is Mine. I Shall Repay, Sayeth the Lord."
See "Trump Administration Proposes New Rule Requiring Separate Premium Bills For Abortion Coverage", by Mackenzie Rigg (in ctmirror.org, Nov. 8, 2018).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY,
November 5,
2018
NATIONAL ELECTIONS,NOVEMBER, 2018...JUST SO YOU KNOW.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY,
October 14,
2018
"FEMALE" HYPOCRISY UNVEILED.
Not "ladies". Not "women". Just genetic females.
The
abortion issue is the single most important issue dividing this nation
and its people for nearly a century. And it was made worse by the USSC
in "Roe v. Wade", a crass political decision totally devoid of medical,
legal or moral basis.
In my opinion, the time has come for a
grass-roots initiative to bring forth a Constitutional Convention to
address a Constitutional Amendment declaring personhood for the fetus
from the time of conception and protected under the 5th and 14th
Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
Meanwhile, this one issue
is tearing this nation apart, much as the issue of Slavery did in the
19th century. Did we learn anything from that experience? Or must we
re-live it?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, July 3 and 4,
2018
"40 STRAIGHT GALLUP POLLS:
Majority Says Abortion Should Be Illegal In All Or Most Cases",
by Terence P. Jeffreys (cnsnews.com, July 3, 2018).
ROE
V. WADE (1973) was an abomination, then and now, unsupported in
Medicine, in Law and in Ethics. It was and is raw politics, the 800 lb.
gorilla sitting where it wants to sit. It could be over-ruled at any
time as unconstitutional.
CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SATURDAY,
June 23,
2018
DO YOU KNOW WHEN HUMAN LIFE BEGINS?
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
before you were born I dedicated you, a prophet to the nations I appointed you".
Jeremiah 1:4-10.
"Hear me, O coastlands,
listen, O distant peoples.
The Lord called me from birth,
from my mother's womb he gave me my name."
Isaiah 49:1-6.
ANY QUESTIONS?
"NOW GO, AND SIN NO MORE".
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for MONDAY and TUESDAY, March 6 and 7,
2017
To Paraphrase:
"YOU WANT TO KNOW EVIL? CAN YOU TAKE KNOWING EVIL?"
GS
Democrats Kill Bill to Protect Babies Born Alive After Botched Abortions - LifeNews.ComMeet the enemies of life, faith, and family
We are seven days away from one of the most dangerous meetings of the year; the UN Commission on the Status of Women.
I
want you to meet the leaders of the organizations that are the most
dangerous in the world to men, women, and children; the leaders of the
organizations that will spend and direct hundreds of millions of
dollars to spread the sexual revolution even to Christian and Muslim
countries that do not want their poison.
- Tewodros Melesse
is Director-General of International Planned Parenthood Association. He
is an economist educated at the Catholic University of Louvain, the
font of much heresy in our world. Melesse and his organization are
directly responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths of unborn
children and the spread of sexual immorality throughout Africa and much
of the developing world.
- Nancy Northrup is President & CEO
of the Center for Reproductive Rights, a group of lawyers dedicated to
forcing countries to accept abortion on demand and making governments
pay for it, too. Her organization has been at the forefront of imposing
baby-killing all over the world. If there is a lawsuit against your
government in favor of baby-killing, Northrup and her crew are
involved.
Help us stop their murderous agenda. Help us stop
Nancy Northrup and Tewodros Melesse. Help us stop International Planned
Parenthood Federation and the Center for Reproductive Rights, among the
most murderous groups the world has ever known. And I am not
exaggerating.
Pray right now for their defeat.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for FRIDAY, October
16, 2015
"JUST THE FACTS,
MA'AM".
"Justice is mine, sayeth The Lord. I shall repay." (From
Romans).
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for
SUNDAY through TUESDAY, March 8 through 10, 2015
THE ACA AND ABORTION. The duplicity never ends.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY, March 1, 2015
A LOGICAL AND REASONED
POSITION ON "ASSISTED SUICIDE", to which I add my comment: HELL, NO!
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid Response for SUNDAY, February 22, 2015
ABORTION AND
BREAST CANCER, especially before a full-term delivery, which may be
protective. The state of knowledge...and of pro-abortion hysteria at
this time.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid
Response for TUESDAY, September 9,
2014
I MUST KEEP REMINDING MYSELF:
'"JUSTICE IS MINE. I SHALL REPAY", sayeth The Lord".
(Romans)
GS
September
10, 2:00 a.m.
Dear
Friend of the Unborn,
Gettysburg
was one of the bloodiest battles in the history of warfare. In a single
day 51,000 men lost their lives.
Here’s
a statistic you may not know. Those 51,000 deaths totaled the horrific
31% of the 157,289 men who fought on both sides that day.
Now
consider this.
If
those men had Down syndrome diagnosed in the womb, the death toll would
have been 141,560. That is because 90% of children diagnosed in utero
with Down syndrome are aborted.
The
chances of living through childbirth with Down syndrome are
substantially less than living through the horrors of Gettysburg.
Why?
Because
folks are scared. They live in fear of seeing that knuckle fold on the
ultra-sound pictures. I remember my wife and I were scared. You
wonder, what if we get that diagnosis? We have faith in our lives and
would have viewed it as a gift from God.
But
others are not so blessed with faith and they will think immediately of
having the child killed, torn limb from limb, more brutal than the
deaths at Gettysburg.
We
can fix that. How? By letting people know that children with Down
syndrome are like all children, gifts from God send here to teach us
about love, even more so!
On
October 18, my friends and I are climbing on our bikes and riding 100
kilometers for a wonderful group founded precisely to make people know
they have nothing to fear from a child or an adult with Down syndrome.
Best
Buddies International is that group and they have my personal and my
organization’s full endorsement.
Best
Buddies is not pro-life like we are, that is explicitly pro-life,
shouting it from the rooftops pro-life. They are quietly pro-life,
helping people with Down syndrome live fuller and more meaningful lives
and helping families come to know God’s gift that has been given to
them.
We
are an explicitly pro-life group and we take the pro-life message to
these people.
Each
year I make a pledge that if I win the individual fundraising title
that I will make a pro-life speech. Each year for the past three years
I have come in second place! I can’t seem to beat out a very wealthy
banker! A good guy! But, I want to win so I can say this:
“My
team and I ride for all those with Down syndrome and most especially we
ride for with Down syndrome who never make it out of the womb. 90% of
those children diagnosed in utero with Down syndrome are aborted. Best
Buddies was founded to chase out fear and replace it with love. We ride
for all of them.”
Short,
simple, pro-life. I guarantee those good people do not know the deadly
statistic I will tell them that day. It may change lives.
So,
please help me raise money for this good charity. My immediate goal is
$20,000 and I am halfway there. I suspect I will need to raise more
like $30,000 to win.
In
the mean time, will you please go to…
http://mydc2014.bestbuddieschallenge.org/austinruse
and give as much as you are able! Fives, tens, and twenties get the job
done. If someone has the means, $500 would be amazing and even more, if
you can.
Help
me make that pro-life speech on October 18. Go to
http://mydc2014.bestbuddieschallenge.org/austinruse
and give. And please send this note to you mom and dad, your daughter
and son, your grandma and grandpa. Don’t forget to send it to your
neighbor, too.
Many
many thanks. Pray for us, too!
Yours
sincerely,
Austin
Ruse
PS
After my first letter last week something amazing happened. I received
a letter from a congregation of poor nuns living in South America and
they are praying for this ride! Let’s let them know that God hears them:
http://mydc2014.bestbuddieschallenge.org/austinruse
- Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid
Response for SATURDAY, July 5,
2014
REGARDING CALLS FOR "ASSISTED SUICIDE".
For
an excellent summary, including a famous
literary reference, of the position of the Medical Profession to this
grossly
inappropriate call to involve physicians, please see the article by my
friend
and colleague Michael M. Deren, M.D., Editor of Connecticut Medicine,
The
Journal of the Connecticut State Medical Society.
"Assisted Suicide: To Be or Not To Be", May 2014, Vol. 78,
Number 5, p307.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid
Response for SUNDAY, February 23,
2014
MORE
ABOUT ABORTION...AND
THE "DISSEMBLING MISCREANTS" WHO SUPPORT IT.
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Rapid
Response for SATURDAY, January
25,
2014
Here's a real-life
dilemma with medical, legal and moral
dimensions. My approach is as follows:
- At the moment of conception, there are two human beings with
rights.
- At that moment, the mother loses some of her rights "to her
body". This includes the right of "self-determination" articulated in
an "Advanced Directive".
- The exception is the right to protection, in the least
invasive but effective method, of her physical life.
- Even in the advanced state of medical science, "brain dead"
is dead. Any further medical "treatment" is "futile", something
that no physician is required - or even allowed - to render.
- In the case of a pregnant woman who has died, leaving a
demonstrably living human being in her womb, she becomes no different
from an incubator for that child until or unless the child also dies or
gets to a point where viability outside the womb is likely.
- Any demonstrable deformities of the fetus considered
incompatible with life outside the womb, like the absence of a
functioning heart or brain, would make the above approach for the fetus
also "futile".
- All of the above is predicated on a legal standing of the
conceptus - fetus as a "human person", a human being under a post-Civil
War interpretation of the U.S. Constitution (ie. 100% human, not
"3/5's).
- Of course, that "standing" does not now exist.
- Thus, the above moral / ethical approach will defer in a
Court of Law to the current state of the applicable law, involving
concepts of "self-determination" and "futility".
The
key to this "gordian knot" must
await a legal - legislative - Constitutional declaration of a conceptus
as a
human being, a human person with all and equal attendant rights.
Will
that ever occur?
GS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
RIGHTS
DO NOT EXIST
IN A VACUUM. THEY MUST BE CONSTANTLY ASSERTED.
GS
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
Religious Liberty at Risk
New Reports Point to Increasing Threats
By Father John Flynn, LC
ROME, SEPT. 28, 2012 (Zenit.org). - Two recent reports on religious
liberty
have amply documented the challenges believers face in practicing their
faith.
The Texas-based Liberty Institute recently published “The Survey of
Religious
Hostility in America.” The introduction affirms that the Founding
Fathers
considered religious liberty as the “first freedom.”
“They understood that one’s right to worship God and follow his
conscience
according to the principles of his religious faith was foundational to
civic
tranquility,” the introduction stated.
The report went on to detail threats to religious liberty in such areas
as the
public display of nativity scenes, memorials to soldiers, and prayers
at
legislative assemblies. It noted that the U.S. Department of Veterans
Affairs
has mandated that funerals for veterans at national cemeteries be
completely
secularized, even when the veteran or his family expressed a desire for
a
religious funeral.
The opposition to any form of religious expression goes to such extreme
lengths
as the case of Jonathan Morgan, a third-grader in Plano, Texas, who was
told by
school officials that he could not include a religious message in the
goodie
bags that he was bringing to the “Winter Party” to share with his
classmates.
Then, there was the case of a Houston-area school district that banned
any
religious content in the Christmas and Valentine’s Day cards. The
report said
that: “When one student was asked what Easter meant to her, she was
told that
she could not say, “Jesus.”
Another case was that of an eleven-year-old student in Hattiesburg,
Mississippi, who was penalized for mentioning Jesus in a Christmas
poetry
assignment. His teacher asked him to submit a rewrite of the poem.
Work-related cases were also numerous. A Mount Sinai Hospital nurse was
forced
to participate in a late-term abortion against her conscience and
religious
convictions. She was threatened with termination and loss of license.
The nurse
lost in both the district court and the Second Circuit, the report
noted.
The report contains brief summaries of hundreds of cases over the last
two
decades of attempts to silence any religious expression in the public
square of
religion.
Regions of the world
The second recent report came from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public
Life.
They published their third report on religious liberty that looked at
the
period from mid-2009 to mid-2010.
It found that restrictions on religion increased not only in countries
with a
record of bad practice in matters of religious freedom, but also in hat
began
the year with high or very high restrictions, such as Indonesia and
Nigeria,
but also in many countries with a good record, such as Switzerland and
the
United States.
No less than 75% of the world’s population “lives in countries where
governments, social groups or individuals restrict people’s ability to
freely
practice their faith,” the report stated.
According to the Pew Forum the share of countries with high or very
high
restrictions on religious beliefs and practices rose from 31% in the
year
ending in mid-2009 to 37% in the year ending in mid-2010.
Sub-Saharan Africa had the largest share of countries with increases in
restrictions on religion, while Europe and the Americas had the lowest
proportion of countries with greater restrictions.
Overall, in the report found that government restrictions were highest
in the
Middle East and North Africa. These two regions were also the ones with
the
highest level of social hostility to religious freedom.
Given that some of the most restrictive countries are very populous,
the report
noted that three-quarters of the world’s approximately 7 billion people
live in
countries with high government restrictions on religion or high social
hostilities involving religion, up from 70% a year earlier.
More hostile countries
According to the report during the four years that the Pew Institute
has been
examining religious freedom the number of countries with very high
government
restrictions on religion rose from 10 in mid-2007 to 18 in mid-2010.
Among the
countries added were Afghanistan, Algeria, Indonesia, Russia, Syria and
Tunisia.
Only two countries, Brunei and Turkey, were removed from the list.
Christians topped the list as the religious group most likely to face
harassment. In the year ending in mid-2010, government or social
harassment of
Christians was reported in 111 countries; the previous high was 107
countries
in the first year of the study.
They also came top of the list for the cumulative total of countries
where
harassment took place during the last four years, a total of 139
nations.
The hostility came from either government sources or individuals.
Christians
were harassed by government officials or organizations in 95 countries
in the
year ending in mid-2010 and by social groups or individuals in 77
countries.
Both reports point to worrying trends regarding religious liberty,
above all
for Christians, but also for other religions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
The Dangers of Abortion
New Studies Reveal Risks
By Father John Flynn, LC
ROME, SEPT. 21, 2012 (Zenit.org).- Advocates of abortion often insist
that it
needs to be legal and readily available so as to reduce health risks
for women.
Some recent studies show, however, that abortion brings with it
considerable
risks.
Research in Finland published in the journal “Human Reproduction”
collected data
from all 300,858 first-time mothers in Finland between 1996 and 2008,
LifeNews.com reported on Sept. 6. The results showed that women were
three
times more likely to have a very premature baby, born before 28 weeks,
if they
had had three or more abortions.
According to an analysis of the findings published by LifeNews.com and
written
by Dr. Peter Saunders, it is an important study, but by no means the
first
revealing such risks. He said there are “around 120 articles in the
world
literature already attesting to an association between abortion and
premature
birth.”
Nevertheless, the Finnish study carries a lot of weight due to the
large number
of women in it and also because it controlled for factors such as
maternal age,
socioeconomic level and various health factors.
Similar results were found in another study also recently published.
Lead
researcher Professor Siladitya Bhattacharya, chair in Obstetrics and
Gynaecology at the University of Aberdeen, and his colleagues studied
how
differing methods of abortion affected the future likelihood of
premature
births, the Medical Daily Web site reported on Sept. 5.
They looked at the records of Scottish women from 1981 to 2007 and
found that
abortions increased the risk of giving birth prematurely in future
pregnancies
by an average of 37% compared to women who had never been pregnant
before.
Complications
The study was presented at the British Science Festival. The risk of
complications in future pregnancies rises with each abortion. As well,
the
research showed that having just one abortion brings with it a
significant risk
for the safety of later pregnancies.
We found that women who had an induced abortion in their first
pregnancy were
more at risk of maternal and perinatal risks in comparison with women
who had
had a live birth or no previous pregnancy, said Bhattacharya.
A further recent study, titled “Short and long term mortality rates
associated
with first pregnancy outcome: Population register based study for
Denmark
1980–2004,” was published by David Reardon and Priscilla Coleman.
They looked at the records of 463,473 women who had their first
pregnancy
between 1980 and 2004, of whom 2,238 died. “In nearly all time periods
examined, mortality rates associated with miscarriage or abortion of a
first pregnancy
were higher than those associated with birth,” according to a summary
of the
study published by the Medical Science Monitor.
Commenting on the risks of abortion for the Family Research Council,
Jeanne
Monahan pointed out that, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and
Prevention, since the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, at least 450 women
have
died in the United States as a result of abortion complications.
Monahan added that this is a low estimate because many states do not
report abortion
data. This includes California, which, she noted accounts for
approximately
one-fifth of all abortions in the United States.
She also commented on the risks from the use of chemical abortion, with
the
pharmaceutical RU-486. According to the Food and Drug Administration as
of
April 2011 (10 and a half years after RU-486 was approved in the U.S.),
there
were 2,207 adverse event reports on file with the government. This
includes 612
hospitalizations, 339 blood transfusions and 11 deaths.
Maternal mortality
Additional information on the health risks of abortion came in an
article
published Sept. 6 by the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute.
According
to Wendy Wright a study from Sri Lanka found that in developing
countries
widespread misuse of abortion “has led to partial or septic abortion
thereby
increasing maternal mortality and morbidity.”
Further studies, carried out by the Association for Interdisciplinary
Research
in Values and Social Change, found that RU-486 has high complication
rates, with
greater medical risks to women in developing countries.
In Vietnam, for example, one in four women who used RU-486 had to
subsequently
undergo a surgical abortion due to an incomplete result from the
pharmaceutical.
Wright put at 14 the number of women who have died in the United States
as a
result of using RU-486 since it was legalized.
Nevertheless, the push to make RU-486 available continues. In Australia
until
now only a small number of doctors were authorized to administer it,
but now
pharmacies will be able to sell it following a decision by the
Therapeutic
Goods Administration (TGA), the Australian newspaper reported Aug. 31.
In the past six years that RU-486 has been available in Australia, TGA
figures
show 792 cases of adverse events from the use of the drugs.
“Women facing un-supported pregnancy should be offered real choices by
our
society, not a dangerous chemical to poison their unborn child,”
commented
Wendy Francis for the Australian Christian Lobby. A valid point not
only for
Australia but for other countries as well.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
FRIDAY, August 17, 2012
Another
example of my
observation: THERE ARE THREE KINDS OF LIARS: LIARS; DAMNED LIARS; AND
THE
GOVERNMENT, IN THIS CASE THE "WORLD GOVERNMENT" AS WELL AS OUR OWN.
GS
Disability Rights Treaty Loses U.S.
Support Over Abortion
by Wendy Wright |
LifeNews.com | 8/16/12 6:19 PM
Washington, DC (CFAM/LifeNews) — U.S.
ratification of a UN treaty is stumbling due to a problem that has
hounded the treaty since its beginning: does “sexual and reproductive
health” include abortion?
The Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities (CRPD) is encountering resistance from senators,
congressmen and groups who fear it will undermine national sovereignty,
that its vagueness will harm those it ought to protect like disabled
pre-born babies, and intrude on established rights, such as those of
parents.
A letter of opposition circulating among
the leading American pro-life groups is expected to be delivered in the
coming days to the U.S. Senate.
The letter explains how UN officials and
advocates misuse UN documents to expand rights and pressure countries
on abortion – despite an unambiguous record of UN member states
rejecting abortion during the negotiations and adoption of these
documents.
While the Disabilities Treaty is the
first hard law treaty to include the term “sexual and reproductive
health,” there is plenty of evidence that the drafters do not consider
abortion a part of the definition. First, the term is used in the
document only as a category of non-discrimination. Additionally,
negotiators gave repeated assurances throughout the negotiations and
adoption that the treaty does not include a right to abortion.
The Chairman of the negotiations called
concerns over UN committees taking advantage of the phrase to mean
abortion “invalid” because the delegates did not intend to create any
new human rights. At another point the chairman polled the room, asking
if anyone believed the proposed treaty created any new rights. No
country said yes.
The chairman also stressed that the traveaux
preparatoire (legislative history) would guide future
interpretations of the treaty. A footnote was added to that text
stating, “The Ad Hoc Committee notes that the use of the phrase ‘sexual
and reproductive health services’ would not constitute recognition of
any new international law obligations or human rights.”
When the UN General Assembly adopted the
CRPD in 2006, fifteen nations stated that abortion is excluded from
“sexual and reproductive health” or that the treaty does not create new
rights. No nation contradicted this.
However concerns remain. Neither the
legislative history nor the footnotes are actually in the document and
therefore can easily be ignored.
What’s more, since the treaty came into
force abortion advocates maintain the term includes abortion and that
the treaty created a new right.
In 2010, UNFPA’s Thoraya Obaid told an audience that ”reproductive health” is a
“right” that was most recently enshrined in the Disabilities treaty,
which includes the phrase “sexual and reproductive health.”
The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) trumpets the “(Disability Rights Convention) is
the first comprehensive international human rights instrument to
specifically identify the right to reproductive and sexual health as a
human right.” CRR believes reproductive rights and health
encompass abortion.
At
UNFPA and CRR briefings with UN treaty committees, the agenda
listed “denial of reproductive healthcare services, including abortion”
among “reproductive rights violations.”
Attempts to “evolve” the definition
prompted diplomats to reject “reproductive rights” at the Rio+20 summit because it has come to be “a
code at the UN for abortion.”
This conflict was reflected at a U.S.
Senate hearing in July on the disability treaty. Pro-abortion senators
gutted an amendment clarifying the treaty is
abortion-neutral, stating it was unnecessary. It is expected the U.S.
Senate will vote on ratification sometime this Fall.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TUESDAY through THURSDAY, August
14 through 16, 2012
DAMNABLE.
BUT,
"VENGEANCE IS MINE, SAYETH THE LORD. I SHALL REPAY".
GS
Physicians reaffirm status of fetus
Life begins at birth, say MDs concerned about renewal of abortion debate
By Sharon Kirkey, Postmedia News
The organization representing Canada's
doctors says life begins when a baby emerges from its mother's womb.
Delegates to the Canadian Medical Association's annual general council
meeting Wednesday supported keeping a section of the Criminal Code that
declares a child becomes a human being at the moment of birth.
Their move comes after concerns a private member's motion in Parliament
could be a back door to criminalizing abortion and the doctors who
perform it.
Conservative MP Stephen Wood-worth tabled his motion this spring. It
has been regarded as a move to reopen the abortion debate.
The motion seeks to create a House of Commons committee to review the
Criminal Code section that declares a child becomes a human being "when
it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its
mother."
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has continually said his government will
not bring forward abortion legislation. With some top Conservative
cabinet ministers saying they will vote against Woodworth's motion, it
appears assured a death in the Commons when debate resumes in the fall.
"This attempt to modify the definition of a human being could legally
recognize the fetus, which would give the fetus rights," said Montreal
physician Dr. Genevieve Desbiens. "This constitutes a
recriminalization, not only of abortion, but any form of contraception.
"We must ensure women seeking to terminate pregnancy and the doctors
who support them and want to help them are not criminalized."
She said it's urgent for doctors to exert pressure on the government
"so this motion has no chance of being passed and the debate is not
reopened.
"I'm not asking if you are for or against abortion. I'm asking for you
to recognize that women must retain their full and complete rights,"
she said to applause.
Ontario physician Dr. John Ludwig warned the group against "unintended
consequences." He said the criminal code is "ancient and needs to be
revised."
"If an assailant plunged a knife in the 38-week gestational belly of
your spouse, we would all consider that murder. But the Criminal Code
says that, because that fetus did not leave the body alive, it doesn't
have any rights.
"We need a new policy that somewhat more balances the rights for women
to have a therapeutic abortion when they wish, up to 20 weeks, and then
protects the life of that child from 20 weeks on, once it's able to
live on its own upon delivery from the womb."
Dr. Carole Williams, of Victoria, said the private member's motion "is
a back door way for government to reopen Roe versus Wade, the 1973
decision that legalized abortion in the United States.
"It's inappropriate to have government intervention into control of
our-selves, our bodies and our children."
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
Abortion does not improve women's
reproductive health
Guttmacher Institute study grossly misrepresents data
By Denise Hunnell, MD
When the United States House of Representatives debated the Protect
Life Act, a
bill meant to ensure that no taxpayer money would fund abortions,
former
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, proclaimed that passage of the bill
would
leave American women “dying on the floor” of American hospitals.
Similarly
expressing a concern for “women's health”, United Nations Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, recently called on the United Nations Commission on Population
and
Development to endorse unfettered access to abortion for teenagers and
even
younger adolescents. In Trinidad, Minister of Gender, Youth, and Child
Development Verna St. Rose Greaves, called for the legalization of
abortion in
Trinidad because of public health concerns.
Clearly, there is a widespread perception that optimal reproductive
health for
women includes access to abortion. Yet, where is the data that supports
this
view? Is this just another manufactured claim by the abortion industry
to
justify the inclusion of abortion in health care?
The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion research organization founded
by
Planned Parenthood, tried to bolster this position with a report on
abortions
in Colombia. This publication claimed that there were over 400,000
clandestine
abortions annually in Colombia and at least one-third of these cases
had
significant medical complications. Their conclusions called for
increased
abortion 'services' in Colombia:
The study's findings make clear the need to remove institutional and
bureaucratic obstacles for women seeking a legal procedure and ensure
that
health facilities with the capacity and mandate to provide safe and
legal
procedures do so,” says Cristina Villareal, director of
Fundación Oriéntame and
a coauthor of the report. “Six out of 10 health facilities in Colombia
that
have the capacity to provide postabortion care do not provide it, and
about
nine out of every 10 of these facilities do not offer legal abortion
services.
While this study appears and claims to support the view that ready
access to
legal abortion improves women's health, a just released study by Dr.
Elard Koch
of Chile refutes this Guttmacher Institute report. Review of the
methods for
the calculation of clandestine abortions in Colombia reveal that the
Guttmacher
Institute relied on the opinions of health care workers to estimate the
number
of abortion procedures and complication rates.
In other words, there was no objective data. The translated abstract of
Dr.
Koch's article published in Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico states:
There is no objective data based on real vital events, the whole
estimate is
based on imaginary numbers underlying mere opinions. Even as a public
opinion
survey, the sampling technique introduced serious selection bias in the
gathering of information. Valid epidemiological methods using
standardized
rates, choosing the paradigmatic cases of Chile and Spain as standard
populations, it was observed that Guttmacher Institute methodology
overestimates more than 9 times the complications due to induced
abortion in
hospital discharges and more than 18 times the total number of induced
abortions. In other Latin American countries where the same methodology
was
applied including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala,
and
Dominican Republic, the number of induced abortions was also largely
overestimated. These results call for caution with this type of reports
that
alarm public opinion.
Instead of relying on guesses and subjective opinions, one can actually
assess
the effect of abortion on women's reproductive health by analyzing the
maternal
mortality ratio (MMR), a widely accepted indicator of women's health.
If
abortion were truly critical for the well-being of mothers, one would
expect
the maternal mortality rate to decrease with increased abortion
availability
and to increase as abortion is restricted.
Chile provides a natural laboratory for such an analysis. The country
has kept
extensive and detailed records of maternal morbidity and mortality for
over
fifty years. In addition, the country has implemented several distinct
interventions including increasing skilled medical attendants for
births,
increasing the education of women, increasing the sanitation and
overall level
of care at medical facilities, and perhaps most significant for this
discussion, the prohibition of abortion. The trends of the maternal
mortality
ratio can be evaluated both before and after each of these initiatives.
A recently published collaborative study by scientists from both the
United
States and Chile have used this objective data to demonstrate the
effects of
improved medical care, increased education of women, and abortion on
maternal
mortality. Their findings should provide the scientifically-based
guidance
needed to reduce maternal mortality in all developing countries.
The overall maternal mortality ratio in Chile from 1957 through 2007
decreased
from 270 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births to 18.7 maternal
deaths per
100,000 live births -. This is a decrease of 93.7%. The steepest
declines were
between the years 1965 and 1981. In 1965 Chile mandated a minimum of
eight
years of free education for all children. This resulted in the increase
in the
average years of schooling for women from 3.1 years in 1957 to 12 years
in
2007. In addition, Chile markedly increased the percentage of
deliveries that
were aided by skilled medical attendants from 60.8% in 1957 to over 90%
by
1980. By 1999, over 99% of births occurred in hospitals or maternity
centers.
After 1981, the downward trend in maternal mortality continued, but the
rate of
decrease slowed. This is accounted for by the increasing number of
women who
delivered their first child over the age of 29. As Chilean women became
more
educated they delayed child bearing. This increased the number of
maternal
deaths due to underlying medical conditions such as diabetes and
hypertension.
What happened to the maternal mortality trend after 1989 when Chile
outlawed
abortion? The Guttmacher Institute, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon,
and Nancy
Pelosi would like us to believe that this move sent the rate of
maternal deaths
soaring. Instead, we saw the opposite: The truth is there was
absolutely no
such effect. In fact, the downward trend in maternal mortality
continued
with a decrease from 41.3 to 12.7 maternal deaths per 100,000 live
births. That
is a 69% decrease in maternal mortality after the ban on abortion took
effect.
The Guttmacher Institute calls into question the validity of the
Chilean study
by speculating that there is underreporting of abortion-related
morbidity and
mortality, but provide no evidence of such reporting errors. The
authors of the
Chilean study, however, have already addressed these concerns in their
published article:
Considering the strict protocol for active epidemiological surveillance
on
maternal and infant mortality registry implemented in the early 1930s,
it is
unlikely that the observed reduction could be explained by unobserved
illegal
abortion deaths or misclassification for other causes. Currently any
maternal
death occurring in Chile is audited by the sanitary authority revising
the
clinical registries, interviewing the relatives, and the medical
personnel
under strict confidentiality rules for determining the primary cause of
death.
This analysis of the Chilean experience provides persuasive evidence
that the
key to improving women's reproductive health begins with improved
education.
Women must also have access to skilled birth attendants and
well-equipped and
sanitary birthing centers. The Chilean study raises serious questions
about the
claims by government officials and other abortion advocates who say
that
abortion is a critical component of quality medical care for women.
Initiatives
that promote abortion for the health and well-being of women
increasingly
appear to be motivated by ideology and based on something other than
science.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
Religious Rights and Freedom
Author: Pursuing Equality Can Result
in Denying Equality
By Father John Flynn, LC
ROME, MAY 25, 2012 (Zenit.org).- In the light of the ongoing debate in
the
United States over religious freedom due to the health regulations
obliging
religious organizations to pay for contraceptives and abortifacients, a
book
published earlier this year provides some interesting reflections.
Roger Trigg, emeritus professor of philosophy at the University of
Warwick,
England, authored a book titled, “Equality, Freedom, and Religion,”
(Oxford
University Press).
There is, he said, an ongoing tug of war between demands for equality,
the
struggle for individual freedom, and religious freedom. Should beliefs
important to individuals be protected if they challenge basic
assumptions about
equality? Why does religious freedom matter? How important is the right
to
freedom of religion compared with other rights and freedoms?
The drive to equality has sometimes led people to believe that any
judgement by
the state must never imply that some views are preferable to others,
Trigg
explained. Yet, he argued, state neutrality is impossible.
“In the context of religious freedom, no state can abdicate all
responsibility
to the extent of refusing to make judgements about the character of any
religious belief,” he argued. For example, simply because human
sacrifice is
religiously motivated does not make it acceptable.
The demand for state neutrality can also lead to the view that there is
no
place for religion in the public sphere, he continued.
Secularism, he observed, is never neutral, but always takes a view
about the
proper place of religion and which principles are to guide the state.
Compare,
he commented, the secular states of France and Turkey, and the
separation of
church and state in the United States.
On the topic of freedom of conscience Trigg explained that conflicts
arise when
religion is pitted against rights, with religion often being sidelined.
When
apparent rights clash, he noted, there is often no middle ground and
one side
wins at the cost of the other.
Integral part
This is the wrong way to deal with such conflicts and Trigg maintained
that:
“Religious liberty is not contrary to human rights, but an integral
part of our
understanding of what human rights are.” Many, he observed, consider
that
religious liberty is crucial for all freedom.
Religion, Trigg commented, points to an alternative, and higher, source
of
authority than the state. While this makes if vulnerable, it also means
it is
all the more worthy of protection.
“The exaltation of the state, even if it is made to appear ‘the will of
the
people’, can crush the individual conscience. Thus public policy, in
the name
of eliminating discrimination and ensuring equality can result in a
secular
orthodoxy.”
British courts, Trigg said, have consistently refused to accommodate
religious
belief when faced with the demands of equality. Such a position, he
accused, is
based on a mistaken view about a hierarchy of rights and the
epistemological
status of religion.
Too often today, he noted, religious views are denigrated as being
subjective
and freedom of religion becomes reduced to freedom of worship. Why
then, should
religious views be protected, Trigg asked.
Religion is deeply rooted in human nature. This does not prove their
truthfulness,
but it does explain their centrality in human life. Religion is an
integral
part of what it is to be human, Trigg affirmed, and to ignore it or
treat it as
an individual choice of no social significance is a major
underestimation of
its power and significance.
Basic human good
Arbitrary restrictions on people’s religious freedom is like starving
people or
refusing them shelter, as religion is a basic human good. Some may wish
the
world were free of religion, and they should be allowed to make their
case,
Trigg said. They should not, however, impose this view on others or
pretend
that religion is of no concern in the public sphere.
Discounting religious principles in pursuit of equality treats some
citizens
and their interests as more important than others. “The pursuit of
equality can
itself produce a denial of that equality,” Trigg warned.
Therefore, when the priorities of a democratic country appear to run
counter to
the policies of religious institutions or to the conscience of
individuals, every
effort should be made to accommodate both, Trigg argued.
This applies not only to individuals but also to institutions. Religion
needs
institutions, which are seen by believers as repositories of truth and
a means
to pass on beliefs to future generations.
In the end, he concluded, public policy is always based on assumptions
about
what is important. Moreover, at root, such judgements will be
implicitly
philosophical, and even religious.
If we believe human rights matter then we must have a conception of
human
nature and in the West this has long been bound up with Christian
principles.
The challenge we now face, he explained, “is whether a strong
conception of
human dignity can survive long without the Christian roots that have
undoubtedly nurtured it.”
<>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SUE THE BASTARDS!!
Let's
see if the
Church, the only Catholic organization with Standing to sue, does the
right
thing this time. GS
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
US Bishops Decry Ruling on Abortifacients in Health Plans
Say Obama Decision Is 'Literally Unconscionable'
WASHINGTON, D.C., JAN. 20, 2011 (Zenit.org).- The president of the U.S.
episcopal conference says that a decision made by Barack Obama today is
effectively a message that we have a year to figure out how to violate
our
consciences.
This was Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan's response to a decision to
continue
to demand that sterilization, abortifacients and contraception be
included in
virtually all health plans. Today's announcement means that this
mandate and
its very narrow exemption will not change at all; instead there will
only be a
delay in enforcement against some employers.
In effect, the president is saying we have a year to figure out how to
violate
our consciences, said Cardinal-designate Timothy M. Dolan, archbishop
of New
York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in a
statement.
The cardinal-designate continued, To force American citizens to choose
between
violating their consciences and forgoing their health care is literally
unconscionable. It is as much an attack on access to health care as on
religious freedom. Historically this represents a challenge and a
compromise of
our religious liberty.
The Health and Human Services (HHS) rule requires that sterilization
and
contraception -- including controversial abortifacients -- be included
among
preventive services coverage in almost every health care plan available
to
Americans.
The government should not force Americans to act as if pregnancy is a
disease
to be prevented at all costs, added Cardinal-designate Dolan.
At issue, the U.S. bishops and other religious leaders insist, is the
survival
of a cornerstone freedom that ensures respect for the conscience of
Catholics
and all other Americans.
This is nothing less than a direct attack on religion and First
Amendment
rights, said Franciscan Sister Jane Marie Klein, chairperson of the
board at
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., a system of 13 Catholic hospitals. I have
hundreds
of employees who will be upset and confused by this edict. I cannot
understand
it at all.
Daughter of Charity Sister Carol Keehan, president and chief executive
officer
of the Catholic Health Association of the United States, voiced
disappointment
with the decision. Catholic hospitals serve one out of six people who
seek
hospital care annually.
This was a missed opportunity to be clear on appropriate conscience
protection,
Sister Keehan said.
Cardinal-designate Dolan urged that the HHS mandate be overturned.
The Obama administration has now drawn an unprecedented line in the
sand, he said.
The Catholic bishops are committed to working with our fellow Americans
to
reform the law and change this unjust regulation. We will continue to
study all
the implications of this troubling decision.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rapid Response
for WEDNESDAY through FRIDAY, April 27 through
29, 2011
THE
LAST SIX WORDS
THAT CROSS AN ATHEIST'S MIND OR LIPS AT THE MOMENT OF DEATH: THANK
GOD I
DIED AN ATHEIST".
GS
A
must read and great analogy of God vs Science. Enjoy
'Let
me explain the problem science has with religion.'The atheist professor
of
philosophy
pauses before his class and then asks one of his new students to
stand.
'You're
a Christian, aren't you, son?'
'Yes
sir, 'the student says.
'So
you believe in God?'
'Absolutely.
Is
God good?'
'Sure!
God's good.'
'Is
God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'
'Yes'
'Are
you good or evil?'
'The
Bible says I'm evil.'
The
professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible! He considers for a
moment.
'Here's
one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure
him.
You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'
'Yes
sir, I would.'
'So
you're good...!'
'I
wouldn't say that.'
'But
why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could.
Most
of
us
would if we could. But God doesn't.'
The
student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'He doesn't, does
he?
My
brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to
Jesus
to
heal
him.. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?'
The
student remains silent.. 'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says.
He
takes
a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to
relax.
'Let's
start again, young fella. Is God good?'
'Er..yes,'
the student says.
'Is
Satan good?'
The
student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'
'Then
where does Satan come from?'
The
student falters. 'From God'
'That's
right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this
world?'
'Yes,
sir..'
'Evil's
everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?'
'Yes'
'So
who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God created everything,
then
God
created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that
our
works
define who we are, then God is evil.'
Again,
the student has no answer. 'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred?
Ugliness?
All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?'
The
student squirms on his feet. 'Yes.'
'So
who created them?'
The
student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question.
'Who
created
them?' There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to
pace
in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. 'Tell me,' he
continues
onto
another student. 'Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?'
The
student's voice betrays him and cracks. 'Yes, professor, I do.'
The
old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses you use to
identify
and
observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'
'No
sir. I've never seen Him.'
'Then
tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'
'No,
sir, I have not..'
'Have
you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have
you
ever
had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?'
'No,
sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'
'Yet
you still believe in him?'
'Yes'
'According
to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science
says
your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?'
'Nothing,'
the student replies.. 'I only have my faith.'
'Yes,
faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problem science has
with
God.
There is no evidence, only faith.'
The
student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His
own.
'Professor,
is there such thing as heat?'
'Yes.
'And
is there such a thing as cold?'
'Yes,
son, there's cold too.'
'No
sir, there isn't.'
The
professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room
suddenly
becomes
very quiet. The student begins to explain. 'You can have lots of heat,
even
more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little
heat
or
no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit down to
458
degrees
below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that.
There
is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than
the
lowest
-458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has
or
transmits
energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit
energy.
Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold
is
only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure
cold.
Heat
we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the
opposite
of heat, sir, just the absence of it.'
Silence
across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like
a
hammer.
'What
about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?'
'Yes,'
the professor replies without hesitation.. 'What is night if it isn't
darkness?'
'You're
wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of
something.
You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light,
but
if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called
darkness,
isn't
it? That's the meaning we use to define the word. In reality, darkness
isn't.
If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?'
The
professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be
a
good
semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'
'Yes,
professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start
with,
and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'
The
professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. 'Flawed? Can you
explain
how?'
'You
are working on the premise of duality,' the student explains... 'You
argue
that
there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are
viewing
the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir,
science
can't even explain a thought.' 'It uses electricity and magnetism, but
has
never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the
opposite
of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a
substantive
thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.'
'Now
tell me, professor.. Do you teach your students that they evolved from
a
monkey?'
'If
you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes,
of
course
I do.'
'Have
you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'
The
professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where
the
argument
is going. A very good semester, indeed.
'Since
no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot
even
prove
that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your
opinion,
sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?'
The
class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has
subsided.
'To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student,
let
me give you an example of what I mean..' The student looks around the
room.
'Is
there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?' The
class
breaks out into laughter. 'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the
professor's
brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's
brain?
No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules
of
empirical,
stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain,
with
all due respect, sir.' 'So if science says you have no brain, how can
we
trust
your lectures, sir?'
Now
the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face
unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. 'I Guess
you'll
have to take them on faith.'
'Now,
you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life,'
the
student
continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?' Now uncertain,
the
professor
responds, 'Of course, there is. We see it Everyday. It is in the
daily
example
of man's inhumanity to man. It is in The multitude of crime and
violence
everywhere
in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil.'
To
this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does
not
exist
unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like
darkness
and
cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God
did
not
create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have
God's
love
present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no
heat
or
the darkness that comes when there is no light.'
The
professor sat down.
If
you read it all the way through and had a smile on your face when you
finished,
mail to your friends and family with the title 'God vs. Science'
PS:
the student was Albert Einstein.
Albert
Einstein wrote a book titled God vs. Science in 1921.
Rapid Response
for SATURDAY, March 26, 2011
AND
NOW...THE MODERN HOLOCAUST
What else can we call a nation-wide, systematic and intentional
destruction of individuals for the sole reason that they exist and are
"inconvenient" to the majority of their fellow human beings? Now
add to that scenario the fact that the majority of those victims are of
one ethnic group. What do you have? The abomination of ABORTION is what you have, where
over 90,000 individuals were killed in New York City alone in 2010 -
and where the large majority of those were Black babies. As has
been pointed out elsewhere, the most dangerous place for a Black person
to be is in the womb. And if those persons were as visible as
Blacks were during the hundreds of years of slavery in this country, we
would already have had a second Civil War.
Of all the most serious and divisive problems facing this country at
this time, the most corrosive one, and the one most responsible for the
seeming intractability of those problems is societal division over
Abortion. Because it is the one most likely to engender contempt
and even hatred between and among citizens on both sides of that issue
- and of many other issues by extension.
That need not be. What is needed, besides a new realization of
the primacy of Natural Law and a return to prayer, is elimination of
the illegal involvement of the Federal government in the question via
Roe v Wade and its progeny, and a return of the question to the States
in this Republic. Barring that action, this country has entered a
permanent period of Decline and Fall. It need not be.
GS
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
Expendable Babies
Human Life as a Consumer Product
By Father John Flynn, LC
ROME, DEC. 19, 2010 (Zenit.org).- Abortion advocates have
long argued for a woman's right to control her body and to be able to
dispose of the unborn child if she wishes. In a bizarre
decision, a Belgian court has extended that reasoning to say that
a child has a right to be aborted.
A Belgian journal, "Revue Générale des Assurances et
Responsabilités," has just published the decision
handed down by the Brussels Court of Appeal on Sept. 21 regarding
the case of a child born disabled after an erroneous prenatal
diagnosis, according to the Gènéthique press review for
Nov. 29-Dec. 3.
The court ruled that the child's parents could claim damages from the
doctors who failed to detect the disability. They said that by making
therapeutic abortion legal, the legislators intended to allow women to
avoid giving birth to seriously handicapped children, "having regard
not only to the interests of the mother, but also to those of the
unborn child itself."
Thus, the judges considered that the child would have had the "right"
to an abortion if his disability had been correctly diagnosed.
The report on the decision did not explain how the court could consider
an unborn child to be able to be the subject of rights, and why that
right was only one to be killed and not to live.
Good mother?
The increasingly common acceptance of the view that it is better to
abort handicapped babies was taken a step further by British writer
Virginia Ironside when she declared that she would be prepared to
suffocate a child to end its suffering, the Daily Mail newspaper
reported Oct. 5.
Her comments came during a BBC1 radio program "Sunday Morning Live."
Ironside also said that aborting an unwanted or disabled baby, "is the
act of a loving mother."
Her statements provoked widespread criticism. Peter Evans, speaking on
behalf of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said: "For us to make
judgments that people are not worth life, not worth the opportunity to
live, is a very dangerous thing," the Daily Mail reported.
An accompanying article authored by Ian Birrell, the father of a
disabled 16-year-old daughter, acknowledged the difficulties of caring
for a handicapped child but also said that it was an intensely
rewarding experience. He accused Ironside of revealing a mind-set all
too common, namely that people with disabilities are inferior to others.
"Imagine the outcry if Ms Ironside had said black children or gay
teenagers should be exterminated," Birrell commented.
Others, however, defended her. Guardian newspaper columnist Zoe
Williams argued that she had a "valid point and was brave to make it,"
in an Oct. 5 article.
Williams declared that Ironside's argument was a crucial move because
she had asserted the moral dimension of being pro-choice. This was a
blow to what Williams describes as "the self-proclaimed moral
superiority of the anti-abortionists."
The Sunday Times gave Virginia Ironside a chance to further explain her
reasoning in an opinion piece published Oct. 10. She argued that mercy
killings of elderly and sick people do occur and that judges usually
take a lenient view of this. Extending this practice to the unborn or
newly born is simply what a good mother would do, she said.
New test
The attitude of eliminating those considered unfit will be aided by new
tests that make it easier to detect abnormalities. A blood test for
pregnant women capable of detecting almost all genetic disorders has
been developed, London's Time newspaper reported Dec. 9.
If more extensive trials confirm the preliminary results, the test
could eventually replace more invasive and riskier techniques such as
amniocentesis, that involves inserting a needle in the womb to take a
sample of fetal tissue.
As well, the test can be used as early as the eighth week of pregnancy,
well before procedures currently used, giving women longer to
decide whether to have an abortion, the Times added.
Alasdair Palmer, commenting on the news in the Dec. 11 edition of the
London-based Telegraph newspaper, said that tests such as this could
have prevented people like him being born. Palmer, who suffers from
multiple sclerosis, raised the concern of a possible increase in
abortions of babies with genetic defects, including minor ones such as
a cleft palate.
Down Syndrome babies are routinely aborted, he noted, and once you
accept the mentality of this being an acceptable practice, it becomes
difficult to draw a line. Should we abort those suffering from
dyslexia, autism, or being exceptionally short, he asked.
"I cannot see any basis that would enable the law to specify, never
mind enforce, a principle which says: this genetic defect is bad enough
to mean that it would be better if the foetus was never born -- but
this one isn't," Palmer reflected.
Even without the new test there has been a significant decline in the
birth of children with genetic disorders, due to selective abortion. A
lengthy report by the Associated Press, published Feb. 17, quoted Dr.
Wendy Chung, clinical genetics chief at Columbia University, as saying
that due to screening there are decreased rates of disorders such as
Tay-sachs.
In recent years, testing for cystic fibrosis has increased, and in
Massachusetts, for example, births of babies with the condition dropped
from 29 in 2000 to only 10 in 2003.
In California, the Associated Press reported, Kaiser Permanente, a
large health organization, offered prenatal screening. From 2006 to
2008, 87 couples with cystic fibrosis mutations agreed to have fetuses
tested, and 23 were found to have the disease. Sixteen of the 17
fetuses projected to have the severest type of disease were aborted, as
were four of the six fetuses projected to have less severe disease.
Sometimes couples opt for abortion even when there is no genetic
problem, as the Canadian National Post newspaper reported Dec. 10.
When the wife of an un-named couple in Toronto was found to be
expecting twins, they felt they could not cope with an extra two
children in addition to the young child they already had. So they
decided upon what is termed "selective reduction," and one of the twins
was aborted.
The article quoted a New York obstetrician, Mark Evans, who is a
specialist in this technique, and he said that many cases involve a
couple on their second marriage who already have children and want just
one more additional child.
Unique
"God loves each human being uniquely and profoundly," Benedict XVI
declared in Feb. 13 speech to members of the Pontifical Academy For
Life.
The Pope observed that bioethics is a crucial battleground in the
struggle between the supremacy of technology and human moral
responsibility. In this conflict it is vital to maintain the principle
of human dignity as a source for the rights of persons.
"When respect for the dignity of the person is invoked, it is
fundamental that it should be full, total and without restrictions
other than those entailed in the recognition that it is always human
life that is involved," he affirmed.
The Pontiff warned that history shows how dangerous the state can be
when it claims to be the source and principle of ethics and legislates
on matters affecting the person and society.
The slide from a right to abortion to the right to be aborted amply
demonstrates the perils of abandoning fundamental ethical principles.
Billy
Graham's Prayer [reportedly] For Our Nation
'Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask your
forgiveness and to seek your direction and guidance. We
know Your Word says, 'Woe to those who call evil good,' but
that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our
spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values.. We have exploited
the poor and called it the lottery. We have rewarded
laziness and called it welfare. We have killed our unborn and
called it choice. We have shot abortionists and called it
justifiable. We have neglected to discipline our children
and called it building self esteem. We have abused
power and called it politics. We have coveted our
neighbor's possessions and called it ambition. We have
polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called
it freedom of expression. We have ridiculed the
time-honored values of our forefathers and called it
enlightenment. Search us, Oh God, and know our hearts
today; cleanse us from every sin and Set us free. Amen!'
Persistent
Myths About Abortion, ZENIT
News Agency
An important statement by one of the Church's
clearest spokesmen. GS
==================================================
ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency
==================================================
Archbishop Chaput Revisits Notre Dame
Controversy
Says Cardinal Cottier May Have
Underestimated Gravity
ROME, OCT. 7, 2009 (Zenit.org).- An
article written by a top Vatican theologian may have missed the mark
and underestimated the "gravity" of the decision made by the University
of Notre Dame last spring to invite President Barack Obama to speak at
commencement, says the archbishop of Denver.
Archbishop Charles Chaput said this in an
article appearing Tuesday in the Italian daily Il Foglio.
The article, published in full by the
Catholic News Agency, directly addressed an essay written by Cardinal
Georges Cottier, a retired theologian of the Pontifical Household, and
published in July by the Catholic magazine 30 Days.
Cardinal Cottier's article downplayed the
disagreement voiced publicly by more than 80 bishops and 300,000
laypeople in the weeks leading up to the president's scheduled address,
and praised Obama for what he termed his "humble realism."
"Regrettably and unintentionally,
Cardinal Cottier's articulate essay undervalues the gravity of what
happened at Notre Dame," Archbishop Chaput affirmed. "It also
overvalues the consonance of President Obama's thinking with Catholic
teaching."
The archbishop, noting that he speaks for
himself, and not for all U.S. bishops, acknowledged that Cardinal
Cottier's essay "made a valuable contribution to Catholic discussion of
the new American president."
"Our faith connects us across borders,"
he added. "What happens in one nation may have an impact on many
others. World opinion about America's leaders is not only appropriate;
it should be welcomed."
Point of departure
The archbishop explained that the outcry
against Obama's appearance at Notre Dame had less to do with a personal
attack than a very real and fundamental disagreement with the
president's "views on vital bioethical issues, including but not
limited to abortion, differ sharply from Catholic teaching."
"Much is made, in some religious circles,
of the President's sympathy for Catholic social teaching," the prelate
explained. "But defense of the unborn child is a demand of social
justice. There is no 'social justice' if the youngest and weakest among
us can be legally killed. Good programs for the poor are vital, but
they can never excuse this fundamental violation of human rights."
Archbishop Chaput also explained that the
timing and nature of the invitation caused the conflict: "At a time
when the American bishops as a body had already voiced strong concern
about the new administration's abortion policies, Notre Dame not only
made the president the centerpiece of its graduation events, but also
granted him an honorary doctorate of laws -- this, despite his deeply
troubling views on abortion law and related social issues."
But the "real source of Catholic
frustration," said Archbishop Chaput, was that Notre Dame "ignored and
violated the guidance of America's bishops" in a 2004 document that
"urged Catholic institutions to refrain from honoring public officials
who disagreed with Church teaching on grave matters."
"Thus, the fierce debate in American
Catholic circles this spring over the Notre Dame honor for Mr. Obama
was not finally about partisan politics," he explained. "It was about
serious issues of Catholic belief, identity and witness -- triggered by
Mr. Obama's views -- which Cardinal Cottier, writing from outside the
American context, may have misunderstood."
Common connection
Archbishop Chaput also commented on the
connection Cardinal Cottier made in his article between "President
Obama's frequently stated search for political 'common ground' and the
Catholic emphasis on pursing the 'common good.'"
"These goals -- seeking common ground and
pursuing the common good -- can often coincide," the archbishop noted.
"But they are not the same thing. They can sharply diverge in practice.
"So-called common ground abortion
policies may actually attack the common good because they imply a false
unity; they create a ledge of shared public agreement too narrow and
too weak to sustain the weight of a real moral consensus. The common
good is never served by tolerance for killing the weak -- beginning
with the unborn."
Finally, the archbishop praised Cardinal
Cottier for reminding "his readers of the mutual respect and
cooperative spirit required by citizenship in a pluralist democracy."
"But pluralism is never an end in
itself," Archbishop Chaput noted. "It is never an excuse for inaction.
"As President Obama himself acknowledged
at Notre Dame, democracy depends for its health on people of conviction
fighting hard in the public square for what they believe -- peacefully,
legally but vigorously and without apologies."
Offerings by George A. Sprecace M.D., J.D.:
See also the What's Wrong and Right with the Catholic
Church section
in The Catholic Church page of the
Involved Citizen.
Rapid
Response Posting for April 12, 2009,
GS
Rapid
Response Posting for January 11, 2009,
GS
"The
Stem Cell Research Issue"
by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day, TBD
"Stem
Cell Issues
Need More Debate: It's Abortion Wearing A Pretty Face"
by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day,
Sunday,
July 29, 2001
"Science
Refutes
Legal 'Roe v. Wade' Ruling"
by George A. Sprecace, M.D., J.D., The Day,
Wednesday,
February 5, 2003
Human Clones? Although the writer of
the
following
article sounds like he may have no problem with abortion ("Stem-cell
research,
or therapeutic cloning, does not create a human life, does not create a
sentient creature at all."), he provides vital information and insight
into the latest - and most serious - deviant scientific activity
that society will have to deal with
GS
Embryonic
Stem Cell Research: Abortion with a Friendly Face, GS
The Reality of the
Child in
the Womb, GS
The following is a good recently published resource
regarding one of the most thorny issues of them all: the
ethical care of the permanently unconcious patient (ie.
"persistent vegetative state"). GS
- "Artificial Nutrition and Hydration and the
Permanently Unconscious Patient" The Catholic Debate", Edited by
Ronald P. Hamel and James J. Walter, Georgetown University Press, 2007.
ISBN-13-978-1-5890-1178-6. (reviewed in Book and Media Reviews,
JAMA, April 2, 2008, vol 299, No. 13, p1610).
Point and Counterpoint:
Abortion
and Alternatives
Article 1,
for Sunday,
March
18, 2006
Abortion and Alternatives
|
Article 2,
for Sunday,
April
2, 2006
What Abortion Is Not
|
Article 3,
for Sunday,
April
9, 2006
Alternatives To Abortion: Abstinence
|
Article 4,
for Sunday,
April
23, 2006
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
|
Article 5,
for Sunday,
April
30, 2006
Abortion And Alternatives: The Good, The Bad And
The Ugly
|
Article 6,
for Sunday,
May
7, 2006
Some Background For End Of Life Discussions
|
Article 7,
for Sunday,
May
14, 2006
“After The Fact”: Post-Abortion Assistance to Women
And Men
|
Article 8,
for Sunday,
May
21, 2006
Food And Hydration
|
Article 9,
for Sunday,
June
4, 2006
End Of Life Issues…So, What Do We Do?
|
Article 10,
for Sunday,
June
11, 2006
Of This And That…Here And Abroad
|
Article 11,
for Sunday,
June
18, 2006
Alternatives To Abortion: Adoption
|
Article 12,
for Sunday,
June
25, 2006
Euthanasia – Physician Assisted Suicide
|
Article 13,
for Sunday,
July
2, 2006
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly…A Sequel
|
Article 14,
for Sunday,
July
9, 2006
Palliative Sedation
|
Article 15,
for Sunday,
July
16, 2006
A Review…And Questions About Grey Areas
|
Article 16,
for Sunday,
August
20, 2006
Stem Cells – The Focus Of Much Research and “Hype”
|
Article 17,
for Sunday,
August
27, 2006
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
|
Article 18,
for Sunday,
September
3, 2006
Politics And Stem Cells
|
Article 19,
for Sunday,
October
1, 2006
Respect For Life
|
Article 20,
for Sunday,
October
29, 2006
Respect For Life Issues
|
Article 21,
for Sunday,
November
26, 2006
The Election, And The U.S. Catholic Bishops’
Conference
|
Article 22,
for Sunday,
December 31, 2006
The Past – And The Future
|
Article 23,
for Sunday,
January 28, 2007
Faith…And Religions
|
Article 24,
for Sunday,
February 25, 2007
A Brief Summary Of Jewish Medical Ethics: Rabbi
Carl Astor
|
Article 25,
for Sunday,
March 25, 2007
Protestantism: Dr. Robert H. Bartlett
|
Article 26,
for Sunday,
May 20, 2007
Islam: Altaf Rasool, M.D.
|
Article 27,
for Sunday, June 3, 2007
Islam: Mahmoud N. Mansour, Imam of New London
Islamic Center
|
Article 28,
for Sunday,
June 24, 2007
Capital Punishment – The Death Penalty
|
|
|
Article 31, for Sunday, November 25, 2007
Immigration: A Crisis All Immigrants And Citizens Share
|
Article 32, for Sunday, January 6, 2008
New Advances In Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
|
Article 33, for
Sunday, February 2, 2008
Sexual Orientation: Religion And
Science |
Article 34, for
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Gay Marriage, or Civil Union, or
What? |
|
|
|
|
|
Article 40, for
Sunday, October 26, 2008
|
|
|
More Relevant Offerings:
"Cardinal: Let's At Least
Make Abortion Rarer", ZENIT News Agency
"Intolerable
Secularists", ZENIT News Agency
"The
Hopeful Future in Bioethics", ZENIT News Agency
"Bioethicist
Warns of Overreach...", ZENIT News Agency
"Human
Embryos
Not Objects, Say Europe's Bishops", ZENIT News Agency
"Biology's
Chernobyl,"
by Matt
Ridley, WSJ Tuesday December 31, 2002, Opinion, p A14."
The "National Organization of Women (NOW)"
recently
announced that the election cycle for 2004 will prominently include a
pitched
battle to preserve abortion rights for women (i.e., killing their
offspring)
under the continuing cynical rubric "choice". Whose Choice?
As in many other spheres of public interest, these "liberals" continue
their articulate, arrogant and asinine assault on a moral nation.
The editorial listed below is a further call to battle. OK,
let's have at it!
GS
"The
War Against Women,"
New
York
Times, Jan. 12, 2003, Editorial, p.14
"Bush
Declares Sanctity of Human Life Day,"
Yahoo
News,
January 15, 2003
"Vatican
Urges Catholic Politicians To Vote With Church,"
by
Victor
L. Simpson, The Day, Jan 17, 2003
"VaticanCalls Catholic Politicians Into
Line,"
by
Philip
Pullella, Reuters,
January 16, 2003
"Baby-Saving
Made Easy,"
by John
Leo
Partial Birth Abortion...Infanticide -
"Partial-Sense
Decision,"
by John
Leo
Copyright Notice
(c) Copyright 1999-2024 Allergy Associates of New London, PC