Rapid
Response for TUESDAY, January 29, 2013
I
haven't read the
book yet, but I'm not convinced. One thing I know: The Fathers of the
Church
had a real problem with Sex, Sexuality and women from the very
beginning.
Why, I don't know.
GS
==================================================
ZENIT,
The world seen from Rome
News
Agency
==================================================
Celibacy
and the Priesthood
30
Questions and Answers
Why
can’t priests marry? It’s a question people often ask and the
requirement
of celibacy has also been blamed as one of the causes of sexual abuse
by
priests.
A
recently published translation of an Italian book addresses the topic
in a
question and answer format, “Married Priests? Thirty Crucial Questions
about
Celibacy” (Ignatius Press). It is edited by Arturo Cattaneo, with
contributions
from a wide variety of scholars.
We
are faced with a great educational challenge in explaining the Church’s
teaching on priestly celibacy, admitted Cardinal Mauro Piacenza,
prefect of the
Congregation for the Clergy.
He
likened celibacy to marriage. The underlying logic of priestly celibacy
is
the same one we encounter in Christian matrimony: the total gift of
everything
forever in love.
From
the historical aspect the book noted that Christ chose celibacy for
himself even though among the Jews this state of life was seen as a
humiliation. He did not generate children physically but loved his
disciples as
brethren and shared a common life with them.
Jesus'
way of communicating life was not through physical generation but
spiritual. Therefore the celibacy of those who follow Jesus in the
priesthood
must be understood in the perspective of this spiritual transmission of
eternal
life.
One
of the questions deals with the affirmation that celibacy did not
become
obligatory until the Middle Ages. For a start, the explanation noted,
there is
considerable Biblical evidence, both in the Gospels and the letters of
St Paul,
of support for celibacy as a sign of witness.
While
it is true that during the early centuries married men were ordained,
after their ordination they were expected to practice continence and
those who
were single at ordination or those widowed after ordination were not
permitted
to marry once they were priests.
All
deacons, priests and bishops, the explanation continued, had to refrain
from sexual activity from the day of ordination. Nowhere in the Church
can it
be proved that a married cleric legitimately begat children after his
ordination.
Over
time the Church realized that continence for married clerics was
problematic regarding the sacramentality of marriage and so during the
Middle
Ages this led to the decision of requiring priests to be single.
Vocations
Why
not allow married priests in order to attract more vocations? This, the
book observed, is one of the most frequent arguments regarding
celibacy. There
is no evidence, however, that requiring less of candidates to the
priesthood
leads to increased numbers of them, the answer replied.
Experience
proves the contrary instead: vocations to the priesthood flourish
and multiply when the radical gospel message is welcomed consistently
and
unapologetically.
The
requirement of celibacy is not a dogma, another section of the book
admitted, but this does not mean it is a merely disciplinary measure.
Celibacy
means that the priest should be similar to Christ and live as he did.
Jesus
regarded himself as the “Bridegroom” of the whole community of
believers.
The explanation referred to Paul’s letter to the Ephesians (5:21-33)
that uses
the image of marriage for the union between Christ and the Church.
Is
not celibacy unnatural and the cause of crises among priests? In the
answer
to this question the author, in this case Manfred Lütz, a doctor
of medicine in
psychiatry, explained that the question is based on an erroneous
premise. What
about all the people who are unmarried – are they all unnatural?
The
celibate life only becomes unnatural when being single turns into
isolated
selfishness or narcissism, Lütz continued.
Spiritual
life
From
his experience as a therapist Lütz said that crises among clergy
do not
come from celibacy, but rather from the drying up of the spiritual life.
A
subsequent question also dealt with this theme of psychological
equilibrium.
It was answered by André-Marie Jerumanis, a priest and physician.
Celibacy,
he explained, is not harmful to equilibrium or maturity if we take
into account that it is a free choice of a psychologically mature
person.
A
human being is not just a mere bundle of instincts. Instead, as a
person we
have an intellect, a will and free choice, which makes possible
self-control.
The
more humanly and spiritually mature a person is, the more perfectly he
will
practice continence at the psychological level, not as frustration but
as
perfect freedom exercised in self-control and in complete availability
to his
personal mission, Jerumanis explained.
In
another question Jerumanis dealt with the accusation that celibacy is a
causal factor in sexual abuse. It would be rash to come to this
conclusion, he
affirmed, just as it would be rash to conclude that marital crises are
due to
the requirement that marriage be indissoluble.
Another
contributor noted that no one would blame the institution of marriage
as being responsible for a parent sexually abusing their child. He also
observed that sexual abuse is just as prevalent in churches that have
married
clergy and that by far the largest number of cases of sexual abuse
occurs in
the immediate family.
These
explanations and the other questions and answers make this book a
valuable resource at a time of continued debate over celibacy.