George A. Sprecace M.D., J.D., F.A.C.P. and Allergy Associates of New London, P.C.
Dr. Sprecace's Home Page...
Information categories at this site...
About Dr. Sprecace and this site...
Access related links...
Terms for usage of this site...

RAPID RESPONSE (Archives)...Daily Commentary on News of the Day
This is a new section.  It will offer fresh, quick reactions by myself to news and events of the day, day by day, in this rapid-fire world of ours.  Of course, as in military campaigns, a rapid response in one direction may occasionally have to be followed by a "strategic withdrawal" in another direction.  Charge that to "the fog of war", and to the necessary flexibility any mental or military campaign must maintain to be effective.  But the mission will always be the same: common sense, based upon facts and "real politick", supported by a visceral sense of Justice and a commitment to be pro-active.  That's all I promise.

Click here to return to the current Rapid Response list

SUNDAY, September 30, 2012


America.  "Still the Best Hope", the title of the recent book by Dennis Prager.  A very good read - for those who can read.  For those who can't read, or who can't be bothered keeping up with events, let's hope that don't vote.


SATURDAY, September 29, 2012

How Carter Beat Reagan --> How Carter Beat Reagan.pdf

FRIDAY, September 28, 2012


I have already noted that the country is so divided at this time that we need to have a clear winner in the Presidential race to avoid subsequent discord. 

Now comes another threat: the integrity of the electoral process. Voting has already begun in some States; and an estimated 30%+ of votes will have been cast before Election Day.  That is Insanity; and it amplifies the ignorance of so many voters in the recent generations.  Also worrisome is the resistance to voter identification - or should I say manipulation of the process of fair elections.  If the result of this Presidential election is cast in doubt, this Ship of State will be "in irons" for four years - and we will not be able to restore American greatness thereafter. 

Thus, the stakes are even higher than regarding who wins.  I hope enough people realize that.


THURSDAY, September 27, 2012

People hear what you say, but remember what you do.

Maxine's best one!! No joke!


<>We need to show more sympathy for these people.  
<>They don't get paid enough wages.
<>They do jobs that others won't do or are afraid to do.
<>They live in crowded conditions among a people who speak a different language.
<>They rarely see their families, and they face adversity all day ~ every day.

I'm not talking about illegal Mexicans


I'm talking about our troops!

<>Doesn't it seem strange that so many are willing to lavish all kinds
<>of social benefits on illegals, but don't support our troops?
<>Wouldn't it be great if we took
<>the $360,000,000,000 (that's billion)
we spend on illegals every year, and spend it on our troops!!!

WEDNESDAY, September 26, 2012


Thus sayeth the Editorial Page Editor of The Day, also of French extraction, to the unruly peasants of New London, CT.  See "'Don't Care' Wins NL Budget Referendum", by Paul Choiniere in The Day Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012.  How dare they??  In this opinion, he is reportedly totally in agreement with King Daryl Finizio. 

So, that settles that!

This offering, and many others from the Editorial Staff of this otherwise very good newspaper, is in accord with the recent observations of Dorothy Rabinowitz (member of the WSJ editorial staff).  See "The Fourth Estate, Still Thrilling to The Spirit Of '08."  (WSJ Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012, Opinion, pA17.

 George Sprecace, M.D., J.D., Sept. 25, 2012

TUESDAY, September 25, 2012

More evidence tht the "Fourth Estate" is being run by  Goebbels wannabes.  See the article in the WSJ Tuesday, Sept 18, by Dorothy Rabinovitz )Opinion, A17).


What ESPN failed to show you Monday night

Important Question - Who were the advertisers?

Those who attended the game said it was extremely emotional to see the entire bowl of the stadium turn red, white and blue.  It took 90 workers two weeks to get all of the colored pages mounted under each seat.  Each piece of card board had eye slits in them so the fans could hold up the colored sheet and watch the game through the eye slits.

 Lambeau Field
This is what ESPN failed to show you Monday night, 
Apparently, they thought their commercials were more important than showing this scene for about 5 seconds.

MONDAY, September 24, 2012

Well, well, well,
A voice from the past!
Who is going to listen?
Do we have to wait until November?
It may be too late by then!
Just as true today as it was when his book first came out.
He was, and still is, a brilliant businessman!
Often we need to be reminded of Iacocca's words.

Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from its death throes? He's now 82 years old and has a new book, 'Where Have All The Leaders Gone?'.

Lee Iacocca says:
Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? Where the hell is our outrage with this so-called president? We should be screaming bloody murder! We've got a gang of tax cheating clueless leftists trying to steer our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even run a ridiculous cash-for-clunkers program without losing $26 billion of the taxpayers' money, much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, 'Trust me, the economy is getting better.. ' Better'? You've got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned Titanic. I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the Democrats out, along with O a!'

You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore..

The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs. While we're fiddling in Afghanistan, Iran is completing their nuclear bombs and missiles and nobody seems to know what to do. And the liberal press is waving pom-poms instead of asking hard questions. That's not the promise of the 'America' my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How about you?

I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The Biggest 'C' is Crisis! (Iacocca elaborates on nine C's of leadership, with crisis being the first.)

Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's easy to sit there with your thumb up your butt and talk theory. Or to send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down.

On September 11, 2001, we needed a strong leader more than any other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of the ashes.. a hell of a mess. So here's where we stand.

We're immersed in a bloody war now with no plan for winning and no plan for leaving... but our soldiers are dying daily.

We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the world, and it's getting worse every day!

We've lost the manufacturing edge to Asia, while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs.

Gas prices are going to skyrocket again, and nobody in power has a lucid plan to open drilling to solve the problem. This country has the largest oil reserves in the WORLD, and we cannot drill for it because the politicians have been bought by the flea-hugging environmentalists.

Our schools are in a complete disaster because of the teachers' union.

Our borders are like sieves and they want to give all illegals amnesty and free healthcare.

The middle class is being squeezed to death every day.

These are times that cry out for leadership.

But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the leaders gone?' Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, and common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get the point.

Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo?

We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened.

Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping the government will make it better for them. Now, that's just crazy. Deal with life.

Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have believed that there could ever be a time when 'The Big Three' referred to Japanese car companies? How did this happen, and more importantly, look what Obama did about it!

Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying down the debt, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that are eating away at our country and milking the middle class dry.

I have news for the Chicago gangsters in Congress. We didn't elect you to turn this country into a losing European Socialist state. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bonehead on NBC or CNN news will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change?

Had enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope -- I believe in America. In my lifetime, I've had the privilege of living through some of America 's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises: The Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Kennedy Assassination, the Vietnam War, the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years since 9/11.

Make your own contribution by sending this to everyone you know and care about. It's our country, folks, and it's our future at stake!

SUNDAY, September 23, 2012



In the area of health Care delivery, my projections dating back to the 1970's unfortunately are all too accurate.  One of the most recent has to do with the massive push by the Federals to require electronic health records by all and for all, on pain of financial penalties for physicians and hospitals for non-compliance. This, despite the failure so far of the software writers to understand or care about the actual needs of health care providers and their patients in the field.  Please see the article in WSJ Tuesday, Sept. 18, pA17: "A Major Glitch For Digitized Health-Care Records", by Stepheh Soumeral and Ross Koppel.  The changes being pushed by these misguided initiatives and by the Accountable Care Act are guaranteed to result in LOWER QUALITY, HIGHER COSTS AND REDUCED ACCESS.   And this will continue so long as our cowardly leaders continue to manipulate the numerator of this equasion (delivery) and to totally ignore the exploding denominator (excess utilization, based largely on toxic public life-style choices that represent 50%of all health care expenditures).


SATURDAY, September 22, 2012

FRIDAY, September 21, 2012

When you've read to the end, come back and read this first paragraph again. 

A Coil of Rage 
The character of any man is defined by how he treats his mother as the years pass .... need I say more about this person below other than there is no character, no integrity but there is a ton of attitude and arrogance that defines his shallow past and hollow future..... I rest my case.. 

I bought and read Obama's book, Audacity of Hope. It was difficult to read considering his attitude toward us and everything American. Let me add a phrase he used to describe his attitude toward whites. He harbors a "COIL OF RAGE". His words, not mine. 

THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT -- HE'S RUNNING AGAIN, YOU KNOW!  Is anyone out there awake? 
Everyone of voting age should read these two books by him: Don't buy them, just get them from the library. 

From Dreams From My Father: 
"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites." 

From Dreams From My Father : 
"I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race." 

From Dreams From My Father: 
"There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white." 

From Dreams From My Father: 
"It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names." 

From Dreams From My Father: 
"I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own.  It was into my father's image, the Blackman, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela." 

And FINALLY .............. and most scary: 

From Audacity of Hope: 
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." 

If you have never forwarded an e-mail, now is the time to do so!!!  We have someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation!  Keep your eye on him and don't blink. 

I don't care whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Conservative or a liberal, be aware of the attitude and character of this sitting President.

TUESDAY through THURSDAY, September 18 through 20, 2012

> By Charles Krauthammer, Published: September 20The Washington Post
> In the week following 9/11/12 something big happened: the collapse of the Cairo Doctrine, the centerpiece of President Obama’s foreign policy. It was to reset the very course of post-9/11 America, creating, after the (allegedly) brutal depredations of the Bush years, a profound rapprochement with the Islamic world.
> Never lacking ambition or self-regard, Obama promised in Cairo, June 4, 2009, “a new beginning” offering Muslims “mutual respect,” unsubtly implying previous disrespect. Curious, as over the previous 20 years, America had six times committed its military forces on behalf of oppressed Muslims, three times for reasons of pure humanitarianism (Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo), where no U.S. interests were at stake.
> But no matter. Obama had come to remonstrate and restrain the hyperpower that, by his telling, had lost its way after 9/11, creating Guantanamo, practicing torture, imposing its will with arrogance and presumption.
> First, he would cleanse by confession. Then he would heal. Why, given the unique sensitivities of his background — “my sister is half-Indonesian,” he proudly told an interviewer in 2007, amplifying on his exquisite appreciation of Islam — his very election would revolutionize relations.
> And his policies of accommodation and concession would consolidate the gains: an outstretched hand to Iran’s mullahs, a first-time presidential admission of the U.S. role in a 1953 coup, a studied and stunning turning away from the Green Revolution; withdrawal from Iraq with no residual presence or influence; a fixed timetable for leaving Afghanistan; returning our ambassador to Damascus (with kind words for Bashar al-Assad — “a reformer,” suggested the secretary of state); deliberately creating distance between the United States and Israel.
> These measures would raise our standing in the region, restore affection and respect for the United States and elicit new cooperation from Muslim lands.
> It’s now three years since the Cairo speech. Look around. The Islamic world is convulsed with an explosion of anti-Americanism. From Tunisia to Lebanon, American schools, businesses and diplomatic facilities set ablaze. A U.S. ambassador and three others murdered in Benghazi. The black flag of Salafism, of which al-Qaeda is a prominent element, raised over our embassies in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Sudan.
> The administration, staggered and confused, blames it all on a 14-minute trailer for a film no one has seen and may not even exist.
> What else can it say? Admit that its doctrinal premises were supremely naive and its policies deeply corrosive to American influence?
> Religious provocations are endless. (Ask Salman Rushdie.) Resentment about the five-century decline of the Islamic world is a constant. What’s new — the crucial variable — is the unmistakable sound of a superpower in retreat. Ever since Henry Kissinger flipped Egypt from the Soviet to the American camp in the early 1970s, the United States had dominated the region. No longer.
> “It’s time,” declared Obama to wild applause of his convention, “to do some nation-building right here at home.” He’d already announced a strategic pivot from the Middle East to the Pacific. Made possible because “the tide of war is receding.”
> Nonsense. From the massacres in Nigeria to the charnel house that is Syria, violence has, if anything, increased. What is receding is Obama’s America.
> It’s as axiomatic in statecraft as in physics: Nature abhors a vacuum. Islamists rush in to fill the space and declare their ascendancy. America’s friends are bereft, confused, paralyzed.
> Islamists rise across North Africa from Mali to Egypt. Iran repeatedly defies U.S. demands on nuclear enrichment, then, as a measure of its contempt for what America thinks, openly admits that its Revolutionary Guards are deployed in Syria. Russia, after arming Assad, warns America to stay out, while the secretary of state delivers vapid lectures about Assad “meeting” his international “obligations.” The Gulf states beg America to act on Iran; Obama strains mightily to restrain . . . Israel.
> Sovereign U.S. territory is breached and U.S. interests are burned. And what is the official response? One administration denunciation after another — of a movie trailer! A request to Google to “review” the trailer’s presence on YouTube. And a sheriff’s deputies’ midnight “voluntary interview” with the suspected filmmaker. This in the land of the First Amendment.
> What else can Obama do? At their convention, Democrats endlessly congratulated themselves on their one foreign policy success: killing Osama bin Laden. A week later, the Salafist flag flies over four American embassies, even as the mob chants, “Obama, Obama, there are still a billion Osamas.”
> A foreign policy in epic collapse. And, by the way, Vladimir Putin just expelled the U.S. Agency for International Development from Russia. Another thank you from another recipient of another grand Obama “reset.”

MONDAY, September 17, 2012


This laughable assertion is a clear sign of how much the Rupublican challenge for the Presidency is in disarray.  America is neither liked nor respected nor feared, by "friends" and foes alike...all the direct result of the Obama policy of "Speak Softly and Turn The Other Cheek".  Three most recent examples include the loss of the "Arab Spring", our handling of the Iran threat and the related fight with Israel - with whom we are joined at the hip.  Now comes the continuing insult of Afghanistan, where Obama's policies have resulted in continuing loss of men and materiel - not through battle but through treachery by those to whom we continue to give massive aid.  This is idiocy and recklessness. 

And yet, Mitt Romney and the "Republicans", whoever they are, sit there with their thumb in their mouth.  REMEMBER THIS, FOLKS: I FOR ONE PREFER A CLEAR AND DEFINED OPPONENT - LIKE OBAMA AND COMPANY - TO A VACUOM OF LEADERSHIP, IF THAT IS THE ONLY CHOICE THE "REPUBLICANS" CAN OFFER. 



SUNDAY, September 16, 2012


And that's also why: Civil Unions, YES.  Gay and Lesbian "marriage", NO.


ZENIT, The world seen from Rome
News Agency

Marriage and Child Poverty

Collapse of Cultural Norms Regarding Marriage, Childbirth 'Has Been a Disaster'

By Father John Flynn, LC

ROME, SEPT. 14, 2012 ( The economic problems caused by single parenthood were the topic of a report published last week by Heritage Foundation, a think tank based in Washington D.C..

In “Marriage: America’s Greatest Weapon Against Child Poverty,” author Robert Rector noted that the problem of child poverty is a matter of concern for the nation. Yet, in spite of government programs, it remains unsolved. One of the main reasons for this is the disappearance of fathers from homes, Rector argued.

“Marriage remains America’s strongest anti-poverty weapon, yet it continues to decline,” he observed.

Rector cited data from the U.S. Census that shows the poverty rate for single parents with children in the United States in 2009 was 37.1%. This compares to only 6.8% for married couples with children.

Some of the difference, he admitted, is due to the lower level of education among single parents. Nevertheless, when comparing singles and married couples with the same level of education, the married poverty rate is still around 75% lower. “In fact, being married has the same effect in reducing poverty that adding five to six years to a parent’s level of education has,” he commented.

Unfortunately, he continued, marriage has been on the decline for decades. When President Lyndon Johnson declared his famous “War on Poverty” in 1964, 93% of births in the United States were to married parents. By 2010 only 59% of all births in the nation occurred to married couples.

It is not mainly a problem of teens having children. In 2008 only 7.7% of births outside marriage were to girls under the age of 18. The majority, three-quarters, of single moms were aged between 19 and 29.

“The decline in marriage and growth in out-of-wedlock births is not a teenage issue; it is the result of a breakdown in relationships between young adult men and women,” Rector explained.

2-caste society

Out of the total of 1.72 million children born outside of marriage in 2008 nearly two-thirds were to women who had dropped out of high school. For women who had completed high school only half of their births were outside marriage. With a college degree only 8% of women had children as single mothers.

“The U.S. is steadily separating into a two-caste system with marriage and education as the dividing line,” Rector observed.

Single-parent families, he went on to explain, make up the overwhelming majority of all poor families with children in the U.S.. In fact, 71% of poor families with children are headed by single parents. Among married couples 73% of all non-poor families with children are headed by married couples.

Supporting poor families with children is a big cost to government, Rector pointed out. There are dozens of means-tested welfare programs providing a wide range of services. In the 2011 fiscal year the combined cost for the federal and state governments for these programs was over $450 billion. Around $330 billion of this total was spent on single-parent families. On average, he noted, the means-tested welfare costs for single parents with children is around $30,000 per household per year.

Education is not the only factor related to the incidence of single parenthood. Rector explained that in 2008 the birth rate of single parenthood was 40.6% for the overall population. Nevertheless, it was only 28.6% among white non-Hispanic women. For Hispanics it was 52.5%, and among blacks, it was 72.3%.

Due to the fact that non-Hispanic whites are a larger numerical group in the overall population, they accounted for the greatest number of births outside marriage, at 38% of the total. In second place were Hispanic women, with 32% and black non-Hispanic women accounted for 26% of the total.

Marriage later

Rector cited other studies relating to marriage after parenthood. If single mothers marry the biological fathers of their children after their births, then five years after the birth only 18% remain poor. If the mothers remain single, however, 56% will still be poor.

Therefore, even after a birth outside marriage, a subsequent marriage can be very effective in reducing child poverty. Rector also noted that the positive effects of marriage are not only economic. “Children raised by married parents have substantially better life outcomes compared to similar children raised in single-parent homes,” he explained.

Going to the causes of single parenthood, Rector commented that the popular view is that it is mostly due to a lack of knowledge or access to birth control. By contrast, he cited research that shows, generally, single parenthood is not the result of “accidental” pregnancies.

“The overwhelming majority of lower-income women who have children out of wedlock strongly desire to have children,” he said. “In fact, having children is generally perceived as the most important and fulfilling thing in their lives, giving their lives purpose and meaning.”

What happens is that many of these women hope that marriage will follow childbirth, instead of first marrying then having children.

The collapse of cultural norms regarding marriage and having children has been a disaster, Rector argued. The results of this have led to tragedy for all involved. How to reverse this situation is a great challenge for society.

TUESDAY through SATURDAY, September 11 through 15, 2012


The person or persons, whether fundamentalist Christians or Jews or Muslims, who are partly responsible for the current world-wide attacks on America, display a deep ignorance for the issues involved regarding the Muslim world.  Our only hope to avoid World War 3 / the next Crusade is to embolden and enable moderate Muslims to attack the fundamentalist crazies in their midst.  Those "fundamentalist Muslims" are not at all followers of the tenets of Muhammed or of their other prophets; Jesus and Abraham.  They are rather standard issue despots who wish to enslave true Muslims as well as "non-believers", Americans or otherwise.  This is a critical distinction that must be articulated by Muslims and non-Muslims alike, rather than by hiding behind the paralyzing politically correct approach of failing to talk about this. 

It must begin with official Washington foreign policy - and it must begin now - taking the place of a feckless policy that has resulted in America being neither liked or respected or feared. And such a policy shift would not involve drones or boots on the ground or another sailing of the "Great White Fleet" of the late 1800's.  It could be done by punishing financially all of those many parties, allies, "non-allies" and enemies who continue to receive American financial support regardless of their actions contrary to American self-interest.  They would quickly get the message.  If not, then we would implement our basic right of pre-emptive self-defense by whatever means necessary. 

And then there is Israel - or, more correctly the fundamentalist minority of Jewish citizens who continue to demand the "promised land" of the Bible but who now expect Americans to replace God in parting the seas in their behalf.  As I have noted on many past occasions: "HE WHO SEEKS EQUITY MUST DO EQUITY".


SUNDAY and MONDAY, September 9 and 10, 2012

I saw it.  This is not hyperbole.


CBS Scot Paulsen on "2016: The Movie"

The Right Politics

This past week, “2016: The Movie” about President Barack Obama opened in the Chicago area, and I chose to get more of an education about Obama by seeing the movie. After the inundation of canned hype for the movie on conservative talk shows across the Chicago radio dial that sounded more like commercials than honest endorsements of the movie, I was skeptical of what I was going to see.


While some talk show hosts sounded like they were genuinely impressed with the documentary and honestly endorsing the film, there were those who were obviously reading a commercial script which was not coming across as sincere to the regular listener – at least not to this often-skeptical listener. Perhaps, in future promotions of the film, it would be wise to have pre-recorded commercials done by the professional commercial-makers rather than having the likes of Mark Levin and Sean Hannity doing script after script to promote the movie. After all, the listeners aren’t stupid and resent any attempt at being conned. After many reads by the talk show hosts, the readings of the commercial script were no more enthusiastic than another Life-Lock commercial read – another commercial that ought to be professionally done.


Yet, I’m glad I saw the hyped-film because it was more informative than I had thought it would be and included less propaganda than I had predicted. If anything, it was nearly too informative as there was an enormous amount of information condensed into the nearly one-hour-and-a-half documentary. Fact after fact is put forth which shows that President Obama definitely has many skeletons in the closet that have not been released prior to the nation’s trust in him with the Oval Office.


To watch this movie and realize – or simply be reminded of – all that is unknown about President Obama is of concern. Much of the information has been ignored by the American media totally. When appropriately reminded as to what is still unknown about Obama to date, one has to ask: How can any logical-thinking person give a damn about Romney’s taxes while not asking any questions regarding our current President’s past? The man influences the entire globe, but liberal Americans want to know how much Mitt Romney paid in taxes in the past rather than learn about the man who they have entrusted with the country. Unbelievable.


The movie undeniably links Obama to persons of suspicious-interest due to their past actions and statements, such as former radical activist and Chicago educator Bill Ayers. While the media and blinded-liberals cast such facts aside, the movie does not. No, this portion of the movie is not propaganda – it is the display of factual information about relationships between people that cannot be denied. Yet, the “left” does deny the facts that are right in front of them.


Quite disturbing is the talk of the United States economy in the film. The current national debt which has increased two-fold during Obama’s presidency and the horrendous economy is suggested to be part of the plan to strip the nation of democracy – reasonable cause to make citizens totally dependent on the government. The “left” is aghast at this suggestion of the current economy. They actually believe that Obama is unintelligent enough to let this economy just happen. Ironically, it’s many of the people on the “right” who know Obama’s not stupid, and much of what has happened to the United States in the past four years is part of Obama’s plan.


How could one so-highly educated and intelligent as Obama not know what he was doing when he incurred such debt? I left the movie thinking more strongly than I had in the past that the current debt and this economy was part of Obama’s plan all along. Increasingly making Americans dependent on the government is the plan. What’s more, he knew his blind followers would believe it was not the plan and, of course, was all Bush’s fault.


He must be laughing at his blind followers all the way to the “new America” they’re allowing him to create. My belief is that Obama continues to prey on his die-hard followers’ stupidity to accomplish his personal goals for America.

The most disturbing part of the film to me was the interview with President Obama’s half-brother George Obama from Nairobi, Kenya. How can Obama claim to want to help people when he has done absolutely nothing for his own family? It makes me wonder if he really cares about anybody if he can’t find it in his heart to help his own family.


As the closing credits started to role upward across the screen, the audience applauded. Me, I just walked out – reasonably upset.

Those who have already decided to vote for Obama will probably not even see the movie. It’s sad but they probably don’t want to know the truth when it is laid out so clearly for them in this documentary. The independents who are still deciding who they are going to vote for ought to see this film. I’m quite confident that any undecided voter who sees this film will know who to vote for after viewing this documentary. If you know you’re not going to support the “left” in this coming election, see the film out of interest if you like. But, fair warning, it’s disturbing – and quite frightening – to say the least.

SATURDAY through SATURDAY, September 1 through 8, 2012


As I have already observed in this section recently, this election season has focused all media outlets on important stories, rather than on providing the usual tripe for the entertainment...rather than the enlightenment...of their public.  That's doubly good news, since it provides easy opportunities for cross-reading, vital to getting a clear picture of what's going on. 

Whatever you read on  a regular basis, my advice is that daily review of the Wall Street Journal is a critical antidote to the routinely slanted output of the very liberal main media.  The following articles, found in just one edition of the WSJ (Friday, Sept. 7, 2012)  provide just one example of the scope, depth and insight offered on many subjects far afield from Finances.  To these, I will add my opinion. 

  1. "Stirring Up The Melting Pot", pA3.  Without mentioning New London, Ct., this describes what is going on in many of our smaller cities: an exploding diversity of residents...a healthy although often challenging development. 
  2. "The Shale Revolution: What Could Go Wrong?" (pB1).  Evidentally, a great deal. 
  3. "France Is Still Waiting For Hollande" (pA15).  Talk about "putting lipstick on a pig".  The Socialist disaster called France is starting to have "buyer's remorse" over its recently purchased socialist President.  There is a clear lesson here for Americans as we approach our own moment of decision over the nation's direction. 
  4. "Transformers 2" (pA14).  A valuable executive summary on Barack Obama.  "Obama was honest when he said he wanted to remake America".  This should be read in context with the latest offering of that great favorite of mine, Charles Krauthammer: "Empathy Gap Keeps Obama's Hope Alive", in The Day ( Saturday, Sept. 8, 2012, pA6.
  5. "Record Thaw In The Arctic, Greenland" (pA2).  Talk about "the canary in the mine". 
"IS ANYBODY THERE?  DOES ANYBODY CARE?".     We will soon see.


Return to:

Copyright Notice (c) Copyright 1999-2023 Allergy Associates of New London, PC