George A. Sprecace M.D.,
J.D., F.A.C.P. and Allergy Associates of New
London,
P.C.
www.asthma-drsprecace.com
RAPID
RESPONSE (Archives)...Daily Commentary on News of the Day
This is a new section. It will
offer fresh,
quick reactions by myself to news and events of the day, day by day, in
this rapid-fire world of ours. Of course, as in military
campaigns,
a rapid response in one direction may occasionally have to be followed
by a "strategic withdrawal" in another direction. Charge that to
"the fog of war", and to the necessary flexibility any mental or
military
campaign must maintain to be effective. But the mission will
always
be the same: common sense, based upon facts and "real politick",
supported
by a visceral sense of Justice and a commitment to be pro-active.
That's all I promise.
GS
|
Click
here
to return to the current Rapid Response list
SUNDAY, JANUARY 31, 2009
Now, for those of you who think all this
stuff is too heavy.... And check out the section on my web site
entitled "A Bit of Whimsey".
GS
"It is generally inadvisable to
eject directly over the area you just bombed." - U.S. Air Force Manual
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword
obviously never encountered automatic weapons." - General Macarthur
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
”You,
you, and you ... Panic. The rest of you, come with me." - U.S.
Marine Corp Gunnery Sgt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
”Tracers
work both ways." - U.S. Army Ordinance
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Five
second fuses only last three seconds" - Infantry Journal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Any
ship can be a minesweeper. Once."
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Never
tell the Platoon Sergeant you have nothing to do." - Unknown Marine
Recruit
-----------------------------------------------------------
”If
you see a bomb technician running, follow him." - USAF Ammo Troop
-------------------------------------------------------
”Though
I Fly Through the Valley of Death , I Shall Fear No Evil. For I am at
80,000 Feet and Climbing." - At the entrance to the old SR-71 operating
base Kadena , Japan
-------------------------------------------------------
"You've
never been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3." - Paul F. Crickmore
(test pilot)
--------------------------------------------------------
"The
only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire."
-------------------------------------------------------
”If
the wings are traveling faster than the fuselage, it's probably a
helicopter -- and therefore, unsafe."
-------------------------------------------------------
”When
one engine fails on a twin-engine airplane you always have enough power
left to get you to the scene of the crash."
-------------------------------------------------------
"Without
ammunition, the USAF would be just another expensive flying club."
-------------------------------------------------------
"What
is the similarity between air traffic controllers and
pilots? If
a pilot screws up, the pilot dies; if ATC screws up, the pilot dies."
-------------------------------------------------------
"Never
trade luck for skill."
--------------------------------------------------------
The
three most common expressions (or famous last words) in aviation are:
"Why is it doing that?", "Where are we?" And "Oh S...!"
------------------------------------------------------
"Airspeed,
altitude and brains. Two are always needed to successfully complete the
flight."
-------------------------------------------------------
"Mankind
has a perfect record in aviation; we never left one up there!"
-------------------------------------------------------
"Flying
the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on
the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
--------------------------------------------------------
"The
Piper Cub is the safest airplane in the world; it can just barely kill
you." - Attributed to Max Stanley (Northrop test pilot)
-------------------------------------------------------
"There
is no reason to fly through a thunderstorm in peacetime." - Sign over
squadron ops desk at Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ, 1970
---------------------------------------------------------
"If
something hasn't broken on your helicopter, it's about to."
---------------------------------------------------------
As
the test pilot climbs out of the experimental aircraft, having torn off
the wings and tail in the crash landing, the crash truck arrives, the
rescuer sees a bloodied pilot and asks "What happened?” The
pilot's reply: "I don't know, I just got here myself!" - Attributed to
Ray Crandall (Lockheed test pilot)
MONDAY through
FRIDAY, JANUARY 25 through 30, 2009
I have just finished reading Jeff Benedict's new book, "Little
Pink House", which purports to be an investigative
documentation of the Kelo v City of New London
saga. Racalling his fine work in "Without Reservation",
I am underwhelmed by this effort. It is accurate but incomplete,
and is definitely designed to be a pot-boiler instead of an objective
exposition of a crucial flashpoint between the needs of urban society
and existing Law. As a result, it is disappointing.
- Although not a player, and not even on the bench, I was
throughout the last ten years a close observer of events as they
unfolded and knew well many of the major players. Many of
them have known my opinions as they unfolded through the years.
- Hardly any of the participants in this New London opera
will have reason to consider the discharge of their respective roles as
their finest hour.
- What were on painful display during this entire time were various
iterations of the Seven Deadly Sins. What was also on display, as
is always on display in this real community called New London, Ct., was
Humanity, with all of its attractions and
warts.
- Perhaps Benedict is saving for a sequel, or for the movie, a fair
development of the many characters involved. This book
does not contain it.
- Also inadequately developed is the central issue for urban
society if it is to survive the future: how to rise, phoenix-like, from
the ashes of many of our current cities and larger towns - like New
London, Ct. The central issue is the need for such communities to
be able to use equitably the power of Eminent Domain, a Constitutional
provision, for economic development as a public use and for the public
benefit. That is why Judge Corradino and also the U.S. Supreme
Court voted as they did in this case. And that is why only a
small handful of States have subsequently prohibited such use by State
Constitutional Amendment.
- Ultimately, Benedict had his thesis and goals, giving short
shrift to the objective accomplishments of this city, however delayed
and tortuous, in its efforts at self-help at Fort Trumbull.
And that's why the book is a disappointment.
GS
SUNDAY, JANUARY 24, 2009
There you go: now you know where your children's and grandchildren's
billions and trillions are going. THAT'S "CHANGE", RIGHT? GS
AP IMPACT: Lobbyists skirt Obama's earmark ban
By
JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON
– President Barack Obama's ban on earmarks in the $825 billion economic
stimulus bill doesn't mean interest groups, lobbyists and lawmakers
won't be able to funnel money to pet projects.
They're
just working around it — and perhaps inadvertently making the process
more secretive.
The
projects run the gamut: a Metrolink station that needs building in
Placentia, Calif.; a stretch of beach in Sandy Hook, N.J., that could
really use some more sand; a water park in Miami.
There
are thousands of projects like those that once would have been gotten
money upfront but now are left to scramble for dollars at the back end
of the process as "ready to go" jobs eligible for the stimulus plan.
The
result, as The Associated Press learned in interviews with more than a
dozen lawmakers, lobbyists and state and local officials, is a shadowy
lobbying effort that may make it difficult to discern how hundreds of
billions in federal money will be parceled out.
"'No
earmarks' isn't a game-ender," said Peter Buffa, former mayor of Costa
Mesa, Calif. "It just means there's a different way of going about
making sure the funding is there."
It
won't be in legislative language that overtly sets aside money for
them. That's the infamous practice known as earmarking, which Obama and
Democratic congressional leaders have agreed to nix for the massive
stimulus package, expected to come up for a House vote this week.
Instead,
the money will be doled out according to arcane formulas spelled out in
the bill and in some cases based on the decisions of Obama
administration officials, governors and state and local agencies that
will choose the projects.
"Somebody's
going to earmark it somewhere," said Howard Marlowe, a consultant for a
coalition working to preserve beaches.
Lobbyists
are hard at work figuring out ways to grab a share of the money for
their clients, but the new rules mean they're doing so indirectly — and
sometimes in ways that are impossible to track.
Congressional
earmarks have had a bad name since the 2004 scandal that sent
superlobbyist Jack Abramoff to prison and earned the congressional
spending committees a new nickname: "The Favor Factory."
Obama,
who campaigned promising a more transparent and accountable government,
is advocating a system that will eventually let the public track
exactly where stimulus money goes through an Internet-powered search
engine. In addition, Democratic lawmakers have devised an elaborate
oversight system, including a new board to review how the money is
spent.
But
none of that will happen until after the bill becomes law. Even critics
of the earmarks system acknowledge that specifying projects upfront
offers some measure of transparency.
"We
hate earmarks, but at least it's a way of tracking where influence is
had," said Keith Ashdown of the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common
Sense. "There is a challenge now that projects will be added behind
closed doors without a paper trail."
Indeed,
some lawmakers hearing from local groups say they're doing their own
lobbying of governors and state and local officials who could have
say-so over the funds.
"I've
talked to my governor and suggested some things I think are important
in our area," said Republican Rep. C.W. Bill Young, who represents St.
Petersburg, Fla. "He knows what the needs are."
Democratic
Rep. Ed Pastor of Arizona suggested it's not entirely accurate to say
there will be no earmarks in the measure. "There are and there aren't,"
Pastor said. "A lot of it depends on what the formula looks like."
For
instance, the House measure, which includes $358 billion for road,
water and energy programs among others, gives priority to
transportation projects in high-unemployment areas that could be begun
and completed quickly and that state and metropolitan transportation
authorities have included in their long-term plans.
In
California, Buffa, now board chairman of the Orange County
Transportation Authority, said he's changed his strategy from asking
for specific projects to pleading for more favorable general
guidelines, including more money for infrastructure projects overall
and a formula that lets cities — not states — decide how to spend it.
His
organization has enlisted Potomac Partners, a large firm that
specializes in lobbying for project spending, to help.
In
most cases, lawmakers know exactly which projects in their districts
can benefit from the money, even though the legislation won't spell
them out. State and local officials have released lists of projects
that could start quickly and be completed within a few years.
In
Orange County, they include freeway improvements and the Placentia
Metrolink station. The American Shore and Beach Preservation
Association, which is pushing for more water projects to be funded,
wants repair and restoration of beaches from Sandy Hook, N.J., to
Newport Beach, Calif.
Members
of Congress are privately outlining their priorities, too.
"Everybody's
making their list and checking it twice," said Sen. Mitch McConnell,
R-Ky., the minority leader. "You are inevitably going to have a lot of
projects that are not going to pass the smell test."
Some
groups are careful not to get too specific, fearing that public
scrutiny could draw unwelcome attention to projects easily caricatured
as special-interest goodies, such as a 2007 earmark for spinach growers
that found its way into an Iraq war spending bill or the now-infamous
"Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska.
The
United States Conference of Mayors released a 300-plus-page list of
some $150 billion in "ready-to-go" projects that quickly became fodder
for criticism. It included money for the Miami water park, which
McConnell has ridiculed publicly, and a skate park in Portland, Maine.
The
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials was
more guarded about its list of 5,000 projects totaling $64 billion. No
specific projects were mentioned — just the number in each state and an
overall dollar amount — making it impossible for lawmakers, advocacy
groups or members of the public to criticize any one item.
Peter
J. "Jack" Basso, an association executive, said it's up to states to
decide what goes on their "ready-to-go" wish lists, but that the
projects must meet rigorous tests including clearing environmental
reviews.
"We
really rely on them to pick things that, frankly, are not bridges to
nowhere," Basso said.
THURSDAY through
SATURDAY, JANUARY 22 through 24, 2009
Perrin, while I watched my total
of five minutes of the coronation, a thought suddenly ran across my
mind: "THIS IS CRAZY'. Whether it's crazy-good or crazy-bad, I'm
not sure yet. But here you have a fourty year old (no offense
intended) who just five years ago was a State Senator in Illinois who
voted over 140 times "Present" instead of "Aye" or "Nay"...and who is
now President of the United States of America. Is this national
hypnosis, or Divine Providence - or is it the absurd culmination of
"affirmative action". Don't get me wrong: I now wish him the very
best, for the sake of all of us. But now, LETS SEE SOMETHING, FOR
A CHANGE!
The only other observation that comes
close to rivaling that vision was the reception about five years, in
St. Patrick's Cathedral, of that bastard Cardinal Law, together
with about 100 bishops from throughout the country in a High
Mass and ceremony that harkened back to the coronation of Charlemagne
in the 1300's. That was just before he went on to his "reward" in
Rome.
All that good persons like you
and me can do is to stay informed and involved, tell it like it
is, and love and cherish our family - especially - and our
friends. Love, Dad
[Below emailed from Perrin]
4 Years Have Passed & Something
Has Changed Already
Headlines On This Date 4
Years Ago:
"Republicans spending $42 million on inauguration while troops
Die in
unarmored Humvees"
"Bush extravagance exceeds any reason during tough economic
times"
"Fat cats get their $42 million inauguration party, Ordinary
Americans
get the shaft"
Headlines Today:
"Historic Obama Inauguration will cost only $180 million"
"Obama Spends $180 million on inauguration; America Needs A
Big Party"
"Everyman Obama shows America how to celebrate"
"Citibank executives contribute $8 million to Obama
Inauguration"
TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20
and 21, 2009
A GOOD LESSON, ESPECIALLY IN THESE HARD AND
WORSENING TIMES. GS
A holy man was having a conversation
with the Lord one day and said, 'Lord, I would like to know what Heaven
and Hell are like.'
The Lord led the holy man to two doors.
He opened one of the doors and the holy man looked in.
In the middle of the room was a large round table. In the middle
of the table was a large pot of stew, which smelled delicious and made
the holy man's mouth water.
The people sitting around the table were thin and sickly. They
appeared to be famished.
They were holding spoons with very long handles, that were strapped to
their arms and each found it possible to reach into the pot of stew and
take a spoonful.
But because the handle was longer than their arms, they could not get
the spoons back into their mouths.
The holy man shuddered at the sight of their misery and suffering.
The Lord said, 'You have seen Hell.'
They went to the next room and opened the door. It was exactly
the same as the first one.
There was the large round table with the large pot of stew which made
the holy man's mouth water.
The people were equipped with the same long-handled spoons, but here
the people were well nourished and plump, laughing and talking.
The holy man said, 'I don't understand.'
It is simple,' said the Lord. 'It requires but one skill.
You see they have learned to feed each other, while the greedy think
only of themselves.'
When Jesus died on the cross, he was thinking of you.
MONDAY, JANUARY 19, 2009
This article sums it up about as well
as it could be done.
The British can see this from 3,000 miles away and we can't when it's
happening right under our noses??!!
The Daily Mail (UK) wrote
this editorial about Obama on 1/6/2009. (confirmation, Google "London
Daily Mail Obama's Victory")
Obama's
Victory--A British view
A
victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher
Jeremiah Wright, the US mainstream media who abandoned any sense of
objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because
they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but
would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A
victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the
cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his
achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning
a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for
style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over
reality.
A
victory for Hollywood , the most dysfunctional community in the world.
Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros, Moore, and Sarandon. Victory
for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to
independence. For those who settle for group think and herd
mentality rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the
right to be out of step with meager political fashion.
Victory
for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people
have already stated that media has to be controlled so as to be
balanced, without realizing the extraordinary irony within that
statement. Like most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly
speak of Fox and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations
and newspapers are drastically liberal and anti-conservative. Senior
Democrat Chuck Schumer said that just as pornography should be
censored, so should talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and
open means of popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by
bullies who even in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and
opposition. A victory for those who believe the state is better
qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer
teachers' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced
that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and
terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist
celebrity. A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has
come to the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to
mediocrity, failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic
stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists,
social extremists and urban snobs.
THURSDAY through
SUNDAY, JANUARY 15 through 18, 2009
- It's all about Barack Obama these days, as it
should be. Historic, transformational, a watershed: who wouldda
thunk it, even a decade ago, that a Black man would be
our President. Even more amazing is the sudden awakening of
the youth of this country from their self-centered political
torpor to become "the little engine that could". If that
continues, that change could be the biggest + of this
campaign and outcome. Of course, there is one caveat: "Good
judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad
judgment". Let's hope they exercised good judgment right out
of the starting gate.
- Meanwhile, I made the bad judgment this week of delaying my
reading of the WSJ for several days. What a headache from all the
bad economic news. In fact, we may now be in the eye of a
hurricane promising worse news to come. See the WSJ article
entitled "The Doomsayers Who Got It Right", and who are
predicting more to come (by Jeff D. Opdyke, Friday Jan 2,
pA1). And who are the politicians and business types fretting
about? Not the massive bail-outs that are being mis-spent by the
banks. "Hard-Hit Families Finally Start Saving,
Aggravating Nation's Economic Woes" (by Kelly Evans, WSJ
Tuesday, Jan 6, pA1). The power brokers haven't learned a thing
yet. So, start saving, folks. This promises to be a hard
nuclear winter, with little help from Washington or from Wall Street.
GS
MONDAY through WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12 through 14, 2009
President-Elect Obama. My only comment to date has been
basically hopeful, since he wil soon be our "one President at a
time". But, given the number of gaffes his
developing administration has made already, I'm starting to get
nervous:
- his highly touted and highly expensive economic recovery
plan is being attacked by his own party in Congress;
- his choices for leadership of the CIA have in
common notable lack of experience in that area;
- his choice for U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder,
is a very successful lobbyist with many high-placed clients...with whom
he may have to deal in an adversarial relationship in the new post;
- the Illinois debacle over his replacement as
U.S. Senator from his home State reflects his evident lack of influence
stemming from his former job in that State, possibly reflecting a
reputation honed from his having voted "Present" over 140 times
while in that Legislature;
- his designated Secretary of the Treasury,
Timothy Geithner, reportedly a financial whizkid, evidently couldn't
keep his own Federal tax payments in order...nothing fancy, just
payment of Social Security and Medicare taxes
- while Israel and Palestine boil over
dangerously, he sends his Vice President - Elect to the relative safety
of Afthanistan on a fact-finding trip;
- meanwhile, he stretches to include a variety of strange
choices in his Inaugural plans, a veritable "Rainbow
Coalition".
Are we back to the always - relevant political commentary of Jay
Leno? "When I think of joining the Republicans,
they do siomething greedy; when I think of joining the Democrats, they
do something stupid". Are we back to "the gang that
couldn't shoot straight"? Are we back - Heaven forbid - to
the days of clueless Carter?
I'm getting nervous. And so should the Democrats. At
this rate, Obama and the Democrats may be another one-term
wonder. But, not to worry too much...the Democrats always have
the feckless Republicans to bail them out.
GS
MONDAY through
SUNDAY, JANUARY 5 through 11, 2009
In keeping with a "Culture of Death" that modern
society seems to be obsessed with, the current media rage has to do
with the "End-Times", Armageddon, the Rapture, the dire predictions of
Nostradamus and others, "The Seven Deadly Sins" and the 'seven ways" in
which the world can meet its end. It is now alleged that all of
the predictors point to "2012" or around 2040 as the time when the
curtain falls on humanity. Much of this is of a piece with
what I consider an oxymoron: Athiestic Scientists.
Based on all evidence available to humans regarding the existence
of God...whether "more likely than not", or "clear and convincing
evidence", or "beyond a reasonable doubt", and based on the total
absence of evidence to the contrary, any scientist who
remains an athiest after his or her studies should be considered
delusional or in denial...and totally untrustworthy. And therein
lies the ultimate salvation of human beings.
Among the usual mechanisms predicted for the End-Times, Fire,
Flood, Pestilence, Famine, Black Holes, meteors, exploding or
extinguished stars (like our Sun) etc., the only mechanism that is - so
far - under our control is the exponential increase of
"artificial intelligence" in our computers and related
inventions. The alarm has already been sounded regarding this
threat. See Raymond Kurzweil's book entitled "The Singularity Is Near",
as well as the many books and articles on the "Singularity":
the precise time when our creation, artificial intelligence, achieves
and then immediately exceeds our human intelligence. At that
time, estimated by Kurzweil's calculations to arrive in 2040, our
machines will have the power to subjugate and even destroy
humanity.
Two points here. First, and speaking personally, I have no
fear or dread regarding any end-times, so long as my last words in life
are not "You Stupid Ass". We should not be the
creators of our own demise...but we are certainly on that path, all in
the name of "science", greed, and - for some - athiesm.
Secondly, if we do not prevent the arrival of the Singularity",
assuming that God has not decided to end his experiment with Man and
his free will beforehand, at the precise time that Man is deprived
of his free will by Man's creation, God will implement His
end-times. And so, unless we act soon to make a
critical course correction regarding "progress", 2040 sounds about
right. Folks, believe, pray, and don't be
your own "stupid ass".
GS
SUNDAY, JANUARY 4, 2009
Today, I'll leave the State of the Union message for President
Obama. Meanwhile, here are some observatioins on the STATE
OF THE WORLD.
- Executive Summary: Not good,
dangerous. But that's what we felt during the Cold War, into the
late 1980's. And then the Soviet Union fizzled like a wet
firecracker, with the help of President Reagan - who bankrupted them
before he bankrupted us - and Pope John Paul ll - whose temporal and
spiritual powers over the decade proved decisive. So, let's all
of us keep praying, not for a "deus ex machina", but for authentic
Divine intervention.
- Israel - Hamas - Palestinians - the Arab World - the
Muslim World. Israel will never fall; it is the 51st
State of our Union, in all but name. Palestinians deserve their
own State, but they are cursed with poor friends, the Arab and Muslim
Worlds. "The Arab World" is a cacophony, an oxymoron rather
than a united voice for anything other than being anti-American, we
being the surrogate for modernity - which is anathema to the Arab way
of ruling their wives and their world. The Muslim World is now in
the control of radical fundamentalists, enemies of the West and of
their own fellow Muslims. This is comparable to normal Catholics
and the Inquisition, before and leading directly to Martin
Luther. So, the status quo will go on and on, there and in the
entire Middle East, another Balkins for the world's major
powers, now heavily spiced with Oil. Did we learn
anything from that experience?
- And can we talk anymore about "The West" as some
monolith? We Americans have learned that cynical Europe cannot be
depended upon, even as those nations become less Christian and more
Muslim.
- Africa is a basket case, still suffering
from the detritus of the Colonial Era and the mischief still being
played by many of those same colonial nations. To this we now add
the role of China, Russia, the spread of Islam, and the sweet
taste of corruption and despotism now being enjoyed by Africa's own
criminal elements.
- Russia, that oriental nation posing as European,
central government control over democracy and society's goals
over individual freedom. Unless that ever changes,
perhaps generationally, we will always be at loggerheads with that
nation, with world-wide ramifications.
- China is not as "inscrutable" as its past
suggests. Help China help its own people, and we may find a
reliable and strong ally in that part of the world.
- Meanwhile, India and Pakistan continue to play
a dangerous adolescent game of "chicken". "Where are the
parents"? That flash-point is probably the most amenable to
resolution...but the leaders of the world must make a committment
there, something not yet on the horizon.
So, is there any hope for the planet? Of course there
is. But we need some real leaders, real Statesmen...not the usual
and currently applicable description of "persons held upright by
equally opposing forces". And don't expect them to appear from
outer space. If there do exist much more intelligent creatures
who can navigate inter-planary space, they are intelligent enough to
stay far away from us. HAPPY NEW YEAR.
GS
SATURDAY, JANUARY 3, 2009
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE RUSHED TO JUDGMENT, NOW BEGINS THE HISTORICAL
ASSESSMENT. DON'T BE SURPRISED IF YOU'RE SURPRISED. GS
Analysis:
Bush's personality shapes his legacy
By BEN FELLER,
Associated Press Writer Ben Feller, Associated
Press Writer –
Sat Jan 3,
3:23 pm ET
WASHINGTON – President George W. Bush will be judged on
what he did. He will also be remembered for what he's like: a
fast-moving, phrase-mangling Texan who stays upbeat even though his
country is not.
For eight years, the nation has been led
by a guy who relaxes by clearing brush in scorching heat and taking
breakneck bike rides through the woods. He dishes out nicknames to
world leaders, and even gave the German chancellor an impromptu, perhaps
unwelcome, neck rub. He's annoyed when kept waiting and sticks
relentlessly to routine. He stays optimistic in even the most dire
circumstances, but readily tears up in public. He has little use for
looking within himself, and only lately has done much looking back.
Bush's style and temperament are as much
his legacy as his decisions. Policy shapes lives, but personality
creates indelible memories — positive and negative.
Call it distinctly Bush.
___
Don't be late.
Bush demands punctuality and disdains
inefficiency. Every meeting better have a clear purpose. And it better
not repeat what he already knows.
He is up early and in the Oval Office by 6:45
a.m. By 9:30 to 10 at night, it's lights out. He likes to be fresh and
won't get cheated on his sleep.
In sessions with policy experts, Bush
tends to ask questions that get right to the nub of a sticky issue. His
top aides speak regretfully about how the country never got to see that
side of him, even after all this time. They describe a man who is
deeply inquisitive, not blithely incurious as much of the world thinks.
When Bush wants answers, guessing isn't
advised.
"He can sniff it out a mile away if you
don't have the goods," said White House communications director Kevin
Sullivan.
Other people write Bush's speeches, but
he'll kick out phrases that he thinks stray from a logical progression.
It's about discipline.
You can tell the issues that really get
Bush going, because he talks about them differently, more passionately:
education, AIDS relief, freedom. They happen to be ones that can be
viewed more clearly through a moral lens. That's how he sees the world.
Bush reads the Bible regularly. Another
devotion: exercise. He makes time for a workout at least six days a
week, wherever he is. And he goes at it hard, especially on his
mountain bike on the weekends, when he pushes Secret Service agents to keep up with him.
He is competitive and likes to stay in command.
Even eating is approached with sheer
purpose.
Bush wants his lunch ready when he is,
and wolfs it down. His tastes are clear: maybe a peanut butter and
honey sandwich, a BLT, or a burger. Former White House executive chef Walter Scheib learned from
Bush never to serve a grilled cheese sandwich unless it came with a
side of French's yellow mustard.
The man from a land of cowboy boots
orders proper dress in the White House. No jeans allowed in the West
Wing. Coat and tie in the Oval
Office.
"Orderliness in the process gave him
confidence," said Peter Wehner, a former top Bush aide and now a senior
fellow at the Ethics & Public Policy Center.
And if you're in Bush's presence, turn
off your cell phone. Pity the person who gets the Bush stare when a
Blackberry rings at the wrong time.
Then there are his stories. He repeats
his favorites. Like the one about the cheery rug in the Oval Office. Or
the spectacular rainbow that day in Romania.
Who's going to stop him?
____
Bush's words betray him sometimes.
"They misunderestimated the compassion of
our country," Bush said of the Sept. 11 terrorists. "I talk to families
who die," he said, meaning the loved ones of those who perish in war.
"Childrens do learn when standards are high," he said in promoting his
education plan.
Ivy League educated, Bush is good-natured
about his verbal trip-ups. Yet he appears to have grown a bit more
methodical in public, as if searching carefully for the right words.
His tangled moments have undoubtedly
helped shape an unflattering public perception; there are entire books
of his "Bushisms." Invariably, though, people who talk to him privately
— historians, journalists, dissidents — come away with a very different
impression of a meticulous thinker.
It is a paradox of his presidency.
Some of Bush's sillier times are of his
own choosing. He doesn't take himself too seriously.
Like his herky-jerky dance moves in
Liberia, or his odd little tap dance while waiting for John McCain to show up
one day. He likes to back-slap people. And when he's ready to move on,
there are telltale signs. To end an event with visitors, he'll say,
"Let's get a picture," and that's that.
Bush generally calls people by the labels
of his choosing, too. Reporters, Cabinet members, heads of state —
anyone is fair game for a nickname. The practice tends to add a touch
of familiarity between people and the president, and Bush likes that.
As for fun, Bush is far from the first
president with a love for sports, but he may have advanced the cause.
In baseball season, he often has a game
on TV, even for soothing background noise while he works. He quietly
welcomes ball players to the executive mansion for tours or dinnertime
conversation. And regardless of the sport, he loves it every time any
championship team comes to the White House.
Their moment is his moment.
__
Bush can flash a temper and impatience.
But if he takes criticism personally — and he gets lots of criticism —
he tries not to show it.
When former press secretary Scott McClellan wrote
a scathing book about Bush's leadership, the president told his senior
aides to let it go.
"Find a way to forgive, because that's
the way to lead your life," White House press secretary Dana Perino
remembers Bush advising her.
Bush is insistently — some say
unforgivably — optimistic, no matter how low his poll numbers get.
"Every day has been pretty joyous," he
said recently, summing up one of the hardest presidencies ever known.
The toughest moments for him come when he
meets the grieving families of the troops he sent to war. Or when he
meets severely wounded troops in recovery. Many of the hurting tell
Bush they want to get back out in active duty. He is moved by the
sacrifice.
"I do a lot of crying in this job," Bush
once acknowledged.
He shows consideration to people close to
him in little ways. He sends birthday notes to staff members. He
remembers little details about their families. When he visits an Army
post to thank the troops, he's been known to wander into the kitchen,
too, to praise whoever cooked him the french fries.
The president is a proud dad of two grown
daughters, Jenna and Barbara. The public got a tiny glimpse of his
softer side when Jenna married Henry Hager in May. Bush said afterward
that his little girl married a really good guy. First lady Laura Bush
says her husband now has a son.
___
Bush is not much for the social scene. He
and his wife will go to friends' homes but stay away from restaurants
and Washington's other delights. His aides say he doesn't like to cause
a security hassle for the public.
That's also why they say he speeds
through his foreign travel. Even in the world's more magnificent sites,
Bush often skips touristy stuff to stick to business, contributing to
that incurious reputation.
"I'm a nester," Bush said.
Nowhere is that more true than at his
beloved, secluded ranch in Crawford, Texas. He has spent more than a
year of his presidency there.
Bush chops cedar, clears brush and builds
mountain bike trails there. The summer heat doesn't bother him so much
as enthrall him. He even set up a little competition, true Bush: People
who work for him get a coveted T-shirt and bragging rights if they run
for three straight miles on days hitting 100 degrees.
He relaxes by reading quite a bit, mostly
U.S. and world history. He likes the spy-spoofing "Austin Powers"
movies. He chills out with his wife.
His time will soon be his own.
"I will leave the presidency with my head
held high," Bush says.
And he will leave behind a lot to
remember.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE — Ben Feller covers the White House for The
Associated Press.
THURSDAY and
FRIDAY, JANUARY 1 and 2, 2009
A HEALTHY NEW YEAR TO ALL. Whether it's
"happy" or not depends on each of us. I that regard, I constantly
advise my family, friends and patients to be "process oriented"
and not "outcome oriented". We have little
control over most outcomes, in our lives or around us. Too many
variables. What we do have control over is our part of the
process, our variables. We should knock ourselves out dealing
with those...and then become a calm although interested observer of the
outcome. It's like taking an exam. We don't control the
areas of knowledge to be stressed, or the specific questions, or the
examiner's state of mind. What we can control is our physical,
mental and intellectual preparation. Then go into the exam with
the attitude: "give me your best shot". That's the way to
approach and enjoy all of life's small and great challenges.
And why is it that older persons like myself seem so wise (we
are, you know)? It's because we have had most of the
experiences and have made most of the mistakes you younger folks still
have to make - unless you listen.
On this first day of the New Year, the most important lesson is to
know and to learn from experience, the least painful and most valuable
being the experience of others. "PAST IS PROLOGUE". And so
it is that my readings are heavily into History and Biography, most
recently including the biography of Andrew Jackson ("American
Lion"), and Tom Brokaw's 2007 book "Boom - Voices of the
Sixties". This latter reading I have had to take in small
doses: too painful to relive the social / political aspects of the last
40 years. My wife were there together for 51 years as we worked
to raise properly 5 children. We succeeded; but so many did not:
two generations including too many fourty year old adolescents and so
many walking wounded, thanks to the lingering effects of the
Sixties. But Brokaw's book is both valuable and prescient, a good
read to start the new year. As an introduction, see pages
426-28. Brokow anticipated the 2008 election results.
But the rest is one gigantic question. Will this country
again become "E Pluribus Unum", united around core national
beliefs? Or will we continue to fracture along our many fault
lines? I have no answer to that question. But I am
certainly going to pursue my part of the Process.
GS
Copyright Notice
(c) Copyright 1999-2024 Allergy Associates of New London, PC