Q) Is it effective?
A) Yes, but not nearly
100 percent .
Q) Is it safe?
A) Short-term, yes.
Long-term, not known.
Q) Can it produce more
disease, like auto-immune arthritis?
A) Possibly, the potential
is there. We simply do not know at this time.
Q) So, after careful
discussion with a knowledgeable physician, who should consider getting
it?
A) There is
increasing clinical evidence that there are two categories of people at
potential risk: those who are genetically susceptible, and who have very
likely had the disease one of more times already; and those who have
never had the disease despite at least 25 years of undoubted exposure
to the infected ticks in this region and elsewhere. A third category
includes persons who have developed treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis.
In my opinion, which is subject to change at any time based on further information in this rapidly changing scientific scene:
a) Persons who have never had Lyme Disease so far are probably not genetically susceptible and probably do not need the vaccine;
b) Persons who have had Lyme Disease - except for treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis - may benefit from Lyme vaccine and should consider it;
c) Persons who have treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis should not receive Lyme vaccine.
Meanwhile, what can we all do to avoid this miserable infection, caused by an organism of the same family as causes Syphilis, and with some similar characteristics?
GS
|
|
|
|
|